Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Item Response Theory | 2 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 2 |
| Test Format | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Conditioning | 1 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 1 |
| Science Tests | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Scoring Rubrics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
| DeBoer, George E. | 2 |
| Hardcastle, Joseph | 2 |
| Herrmann-Abell, Cari F. | 2 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textHerrmann-Abell, Cari F.; Hardcastle, Joseph; DeBoer, George E. – Grantee Submission, 2022
As implementation of the "Next Generation Science Standards" moves forward, there is a need for new assessments that can measure students' integrated three-dimensional science learning. The National Research Council has suggested that these assessments be multicomponent tasks that utilize a combination of item formats including…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Conditioning, Test Items, Item Response Theory
Herrmann-Abell, Cari F.; Hardcastle, Joseph; DeBoer, George E. – Grantee Submission, 2019
The "Next Generation Science Standards" calls for new assessments that measure students' integrated three-dimensional science learning. The National Research Council has suggested that these assessments utilize a combination of item formats including constructed-response and multiple-choice. In this study, students were randomly assigned…
Descriptors: Science Tests, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Format, Test Items
