Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Conceptual Tempo | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Cognitive Tests | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Evaluation Research | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Predictor Variables | 1 |
| Research Methodology | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Learning and Individual… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Matching Familiar Figures Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCarretero-Dios, Hugo; Macarena, De los Santos-Roig; Buela-Casal, Gualberto – Learning and Individual Differences, 2008
This study is an item analysis of the Matching Familiar Figures Test-20. We examined error scores in the Matching Familiar Figures Test-20 to determine the influence of the difficulty of the test on the assessment of reflection-impulsivity. The sample included 700 participants aged between 6 and 12 years. The results obtained from the corrected…
Descriptors: Conceptual Tempo, Individual Differences, Item Analysis, Children
Download full textBrinzer, Raymond J. – 1979
The problem engendered by the Matching Familiar Figures (MFF) Test is one of instrument integrity (II). II is delimited by validity, reliability, and utility of MFF as a measure of the reflective-impulsive construct. Validity, reliability and utility of construct assessment may be improved by utilizing: (1) a prototypic scoring model that will…
Descriptors: Conceptual Tempo, Difficulty Level, Item Analysis, Research Methodology
