Descriptor
| Delivery Systems | 16 |
| Elementary Education | 16 |
| Resource Room Programs | 16 |
| Learning Disabilities | 6 |
| Mainstreaming | 5 |
| Academic Achievement | 4 |
| Inclusive Schools | 4 |
| Student Placement | 4 |
| Gifted | 3 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 3 |
| Intervention | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 11 |
| Journal Articles | 10 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reference Materials -… | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 3 |
Location
| Delaware | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSwiatek, Mary Ann; Lupkowski-Shoplik, Ann – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2003
Third through sixth graders (n=4,514) scoring at or above the 95th percentile on standardized achievement tests reported on their educational experiences. Although 40% of students were in pull-out programs, 37% were not receiving any special programming. Gender, grade level, and type of school (public vs. private/parochial) explained little of the…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Elementary Education, Gifted, Middle Schools
Potter, Margaret; Mirkin, Phyllis – 1982
A national sample of 53 elementary teachers and 34 secondary school teachers who provide Level III resource room service to learning disabled students was asked to complete a survey on program planning and implementation practices. Statistical analyses of responses revealed no differences of practical value between the practices of elementary and…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities, Program Development
Peer reviewedLe Mare, Lucy; de la Ronde, Marie – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2000
Relations among social status, current service delivery, and service delivery preferences were examined in 42 students with learning disabilities (LD), 40 low-achieving, and 42 average/high-achieving students in grades 2-4 and 6-7. Most students preferred pullout service to in-class service. Only among LD students were self- and peer-rated social…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Elementary Education, Inclusive Schools, Learning Disabilities
Christenson, Sandra L.; Ysseldyke, James E. – 1986
The paper integrates results from three studies that examined learning disabled (LD) and regular education students' academic responding time in different instructional arrangements: (1) high, middle, and low reading group placement, (2) regular and resource room placement, and (3) special education service level placement. Sixty-nine second-,…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Elementary Education, Grouping (Instructional Purposes), Learning Disabilities
Chudek, Anne Sapp; And Others – 1980
The handbook outlines a resource room program which provides an alternative to segregated special classes for mildly handicapped elementary students. The primary goal of the resource room is to maintain students with special needs in a regular classroom by providing supportive and educationally related services both to the student and to his/her…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Delivery Systems, Elementary Education, Mild Disabilities
Peer reviewedFranklin, Gerald S., Jr.; Sparkman, William E. – Journal of Education Finance, 1978
Compares the cost-effectiveness of two delivery systems for elementary learning-disabled students--the self-contained special learning disabilities classroom, and the regular classroom with resource room or learning center. (JG)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cost Effectiveness, Delivery Systems, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedSpeece, Deborah L.; Mandell, Colleen J. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980
To assess the delivery of support services from resource room teachers to regular elementary teachers involved in mainstreaming learning disabled students, the Index of Support Services (a list of 26 services) was developed and distributed to 228 regular educators for rating. (Author/SBH)
Descriptors: Ancillary School Services, Delivery Systems, Elementary Education, Exceptional Child Research
Peer reviewedGelzheiser, Lynn M.; Meyers, Joel – Exceptionality, 1996
The researchers who conducted a study of the views of regular elementary teachers toward provision of special services through either "pull-in" or "pull-out" programs consider the researcher's role as change agent. The authors stress the timing of their research (with new legislation mandating consultant teacher services) and…
Descriptors: Change Agents, Delivery Systems, Educational Change, Educational Researchers
Peer reviewedPapeliadu, Susana – European Journal of Special Needs Education, 1995
Elementary students (n=150) with learning disabilities were interviewed regarding their preferences for special education service delivery. Students (who were all currently receiving pull-out services) preferred receiving extra help in the special education class from the special education teacher. Students' preferences were not related to age,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Age, Delivery Systems, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedMerrell, Kenneth W.; Merz, Judi M. – B.C. Journal of Special Education, 1992
This study compared regular education teacher evaluations of the social competence of elementary children with learning disabilities (n=68) receiving services in either traditional "pull out" models or in "integrated" programs. It found that service delivery model alone without any specific planned social-behavioral interventions did not have a…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Elementary Education, Instructional Effectiveness, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewedMarston, Douglas – Journal of Special Education, 1996
Two studies compared the inclusion only, pull-out only, and combined services models for elementary students with mild disabilities, using a survey of 80 teachers and comparison of reading improvement in 240 students in the 3 models. Teacher satisfaction and student progress in reading were significantly greater for the combined services model.…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Elementary Education, Inclusive Schools, Instructional Effectiveness
Peer reviewedSwenson, Nora C. – Communication Disorders Quarterly, 2000
This article discusses inclusive and collaborative intervention for students with disabilities. A case study of an 8-year-old boy with language impairments contrasts language gains when service delivery was changed from a pull-out model to the Class within a Class (CWC) model when significantly more language gains were obtained. (Contains…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Delivery Systems, Elementary Education, Inclusive Schools
Peer reviewedGelzheiser, Lynn M.; Meyers, Joel – Exceptionality, 1996
This study compared the views of 11 general education elementary teachers whose remedial reading students participated in integrated pull-in programs with views of 11 colleagues with similar students served by pull-out programs. Intergroup differences included more positive attitudes toward pull-in programs by teachers experienced with them than…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Elementary Education, Elementary School Teachers, Inclusive Schools
Gilman, David Alan; Sousa-Roy, Pramila – 1989
In order to evaluate the most effective delivery format for providing gifted/talented education, 247 elementary students in gifted programs in Evansville, Indiana, were divided into experimental students, who received instruction in self-contained classrooms of fellow gifted students, and control students, who received instruction in a pull-out…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Delivery Systems, Elementary Education, Enrichment Activities
Peer reviewedCornell, Dewey G.; And Others – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1992
First-year data from a longitudinal investigation of over 1,100 children receiving different types of gifted services or regular instruction indicated significant differences in achievement levels, self-concepts, and teacher ratings of students selected for different services, with achievement fostered by special school and class options and…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academically Gifted, Delivery Systems, Educational Methods
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2

