Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Bayesian Statistics | 3 |
| Decision Making | 3 |
| Predictor Variables | 3 |
| Regression (Statistics) | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Aptitude Treatment Interaction | 1 |
| At Risk Persons | 1 |
| Chi Square | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Moxley, Jerad | 1 |
| Muchinsky, Paul M. | 1 |
| Schatschneider, Chris | 1 |
| Skilling, Nancy J. Langham | 1 |
| Wagner, Richard K. | 1 |
| Zirps, Fotena A. | 1 |
| van der Linden, Wim J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wagner, Richard K.; Moxley, Jerad; Schatschneider, Chris; Zirps, Fotena A. – Scientific Studies of Reading, 2023
Purpose: Bayesian-based models for diagnosis are common in medicine but have not been incorporated into identification models for dyslexia. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate Bayesian identification models that included a broader set of predictors and that capitalized on recent developments in modeling the prevalence of dyslexia.…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Identification, Dyslexia, Models
van der Linden, Wim J. – 1980
The issues of treatment assignment is ordinarily dealt with within the framework of testing aptitude treatment interaction (ATI) hypothesis. ATI research mostly uses linear regression techniques, and an ATI exists when the aptitude treatment (AT) regression lines cross each other within the relevant interval of the aptitude variable. Consistent…
Descriptors: Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Bayesian Statistics, Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedMuchinsky, Paul M.; Skilling, Nancy J. Langham – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1992
The economic utility of the following 5 weighting methods for evaluating consumer loan applications was determined using a sample of 443 loans: (1) unit; (2) weighted application blank; (3) chi square; (4) Bayes; and (5) regression. The unit and weighted application blank procedures were the best approaches. (SLD)
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Chi Square, Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness

Direct link
