Descriptor
| Data Collection | 2 |
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Educational Policy | 2 |
| Community Involvement | 1 |
| Compensatory Education | 1 |
| Court Role | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evaluation Utilization | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Mainstreaming | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Evaluation and… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education Consolidation… | 1 |
| Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedStonehill, Robert M.; Groves, Curtis L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983
U.S. Department of Education (ED) activities relating to the utility of Title I evaluations are discussed within the context of an overview of the Title I Evaluation and Reporting System (TIERS) and a history of Title I evaluations. Implications for Chapter 1 of the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act (ECIA) of 1981 are considered. (LC)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Data Collection, Decision Making, Educational Policy
Peer reviewedWolf, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The Judicial Evaluation Method (JEM) is useful for aiding decision-making bodies to formulate policies. Broad public participation in complex issues is provided by JEM. (The conceptualization, policy formulation stages, and participant roles are identified; and the model is applied in two case studies). (MH)
Descriptors: Community Involvement, Court Role, Data Analysis, Data Collection
