Descriptor
Source
| Psychological Review | 4 |
Author
| Bobrow, Daniel G. | 1 |
| Chater, Nick | 1 |
| Ericsson, K. Anders | 1 |
| Klauer, Karl Christoph | 1 |
| Norman, Donald A. | 1 |
| Oaksford, Mike | 1 |
| Simon, Herbert A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKlauer, Karl Christoph – Psychological Review, 1999
Argues that selecting data according to expected information gain, as proposed by M. Oaksford and N. Chater (1994, 1996), leads to suboptimal performance in Bayesian hypothesis testing. Procedures are presented that are better justified normatively, their psychological implications are explored, and a number of novel predictions are derived under…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Data Collection, Hypothesis Testing, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewedChater, Nick; Oaksford, Mike – Psychological Review, 1999
Argues that Klauer's proposal (1999) and proposal presented are equally well justified from a normative perspective and that, where the predictions of the two approaches diverge, the existing empirical evidence is consistent with the information gain approach. Recommends that more empirical research is required to decide between these two…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Data Collection, Hypothesis Testing, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewedNorman, Donald A.; Bobrow, Daniel G. – Psychological Review, 1976
When a person performs several activities at the same time, there is often competition for the processing resources required to do those activities. Recently, the authors developed a method for analyzing the tradeoffs that can occur when two or more tasks compete for the same limited resource. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Learning Theories, Psychological Studies, Task Analysis
Peer reviewedEricsson, K. Anders; Simon, Herbert A. – Psychological Review, 1980
Accounting for verbal reports requires explication of the mechanisms by which the reports are generated and influenced by experimental factors. We discuss different cognitive processes underlying verbalization and present a model of how subjects, when asked to think aloud, verbalize information from their short-term memory. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Cognitive Processes, Data Analysis, Data Collection


