Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Educational Benefits | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Independent Study | 1 |
| Learning Analytics | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| Metacognition | 1 |
| Open Source Technology | 1 |
Author
| Chang, Daniel | 1 |
| Lin, Michael Pin-Chuan | 1 |
| Marzouk, Zahia | 1 |
| Nesbit, John C. | 1 |
| Patzak, Alexandra | 1 |
| Rakovic, Mladen | 1 |
| Samadi, Donya | 1 |
| Teng, Kenny | 1 |
| Vytasek, Jovita | 1 |
| Winne, Philip H. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textWinne, Philip H.; Teng, Kenny; Chang, Daniel; Lin, Michael Pin-Chuan; Marzouk, Zahia; Nesbit, John C.; Patzak, Alexandra; Rakovic, Mladen; Samadi, Donya; Vytasek, Jovita – Journal of Learning Analytics, 2019
Data used in learning analytics rarely provide strong and clear signals about how learners process content. As a result, learning as a process is not clearly described for learners or for learning scientists. GaĊĦevic, Dawson, and Siemens (2015) urged data be sought that more straightforwardly describe processes in terms of events within learning…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, Learning Processes, Independent Study, Computer Software
