Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 7 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 19 |
Descriptor
| Cutting Scores | 33 |
| Difficulty Level | 33 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 27 |
| Test Items | 27 |
| Item Response Theory | 8 |
| Item Analysis | 7 |
| Licensing Examinations… | 7 |
| Standard Setting | 7 |
| Foreign Countries | 6 |
| Interrater Reliability | 6 |
| Standards | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Clauser, Brian E. | 2 |
| Hein, Serge F. | 2 |
| Wyse, Adam E. | 2 |
| Arce, Alvaro J. | 1 |
| Aziz, Azrilah Abdul | 1 |
| Bichi, Ado Abdu | 1 |
| Bramley, Tom | 1 |
| Buckendahl, Chad W. | 1 |
| Cassady, Jerrell C. | 1 |
| Cetin, Sevda | 1 |
| Chang, Lei | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 23 |
| Journal Articles | 21 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 8 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 8 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 6 |
| Postsecondary Education | 5 |
| Secondary Education | 4 |
| Grade 5 | 3 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
| Researchers | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education Consolidation… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Advanced Placement… | 1 |
| Motivated Strategies for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Clauser, Brian E.; Kane, Michael; Clauser, Jerome C. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2020
An Angoff standard setting study generally yields judgments on a number of items by a number of judges (who may or may not be nested in panels). Variability associated with judges (and possibly panels) contributes error to the resulting cut score. The variability associated with items plays a more complicated role. To the extent that the mean item…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Generalization, Decision Making, Standard Setting
Kara, Hakan; Cetin, Sevda – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2020
In this study, the efficiency of various random sampling methods to reduce the number of items rated by judges in an Angoff standard-setting study was examined and the methods were compared with each other. Firstly, the full-length test was formed by combining Placement Test 2012 and 2013 mathematics subsets. After then, simple random sampling…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Sampling, Error of Measurement
Bramley, Tom – Research Matters, 2020
The aim of this study was to compare, by simulation, the accuracy of mapping a cut-score from one test to another by expert judgement (using the Angoff method) versus the accuracy with a small-sample equating method (chained linear equating). As expected, the standard-setting method resulted in more accurate equating when we assumed a higher level…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Equated Scores, Accuracy
Thomas, Christopher L.; Cassady, Jerrell C.; Finch, W. Holmes – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2018
The purpose of the current examination was to preliminarily suggest severity standards for the recently revised Cognitive Test Anxiety Scale-Second Edition (CTAS-2). Participants responded to the CTAS-2, Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), and FRIEDBEN Test Anxiety Scale. Using both latent class and cluster analyses, we were…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Test Anxiety, Cutting Scores, Multivariate Analysis
Bichi, Ado Abdu; Talib, Rohaya; Embong, Rahimah; Mohamed, Hasnah Binti; Ismail, Mohd Sani; Ibrahim, Abdallah – Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019
Purpose: University placement test is an important admission policy priority in Nigeria, because it serves as a university-based selection criterion for placement of students into undergraduate programs in Nigeria. Although recently attention have been shifted on the call to develop a standard content and standardize the test, yet attention has…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Economics Education, Student Placement, Cutting Scores
Wyse, Adam E. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2018
This article discusses regression effects that are commonly observed in Angoff ratings where panelists tend to think that hard items are easier than they are and easy items are more difficult than they are in comparison to estimated item difficulties. Analyses of data from two credentialing exams illustrate these regression effects and the…
Descriptors: Regression (Statistics), Test Items, Difficulty Level, Licensing Examinations (Professions)
Moloi, Qetelo M.; Kanjee, Anil; Roberts, Nicky – Pythagoras, 2019
Within initial teacher education there is increasing pressure to enhance the use of assessment data to support students to improve their knowledge and skills, and to determine what standards they meet upon graduation. For such data to be useful, both programme designers and students require meaningful and comprehensive assessment reports on…
Descriptors: Preservice Teacher Education, Teacher Education Programs, Standard Setting, Mathematics Tests
Khatimin, Nuraini; Aziz, Azrilah Abdul; Zaharim, Azami; Yasin, Siti Hanani Mat – International Education Studies, 2013
Measurement and evaluation of students' achievement are an important aspect to make sure that students really understand the course content and monitor students' achievement level. Performance is not only reflected from the numbers of high achievers of the students, but also on quality of the grade obtained; does the grade "A" truly…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Item Response Theory, Measurement Objectives, Measurement Techniques
Sorensen, Henry L. – ProQuest LLC, 2013
Cut-score setting processes are used to establish the passing standards for all kinds of tests in education and for credentialing. While experts use their best efforts to guide cut-score setting processes to generate valid and reliable results, cut-score participants often have a difficult time understanding the standard at which the cut score is…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level
Çetin, Sevda; Gelbal, Selahattin – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2013
In this research, the cut score of a foundation university was re-calculated with bookmark method and with Angoff method, each of which is a standard setting method; and the cut scores found were compared with the current proficiency score. Thus, the final cut score was found to be 27.87 with the cooperative work of 17 experts through the Angoff…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Comparative Analysis, Cutting Scores, Correlation
Arce, Alvaro J.; Wang, Ze – International Journal of Testing, 2012
The traditional approach to scale modified-Angoff cut scores transfers the raw cuts to an existing raw-to-scale score conversion table. Under the traditional approach, cut scores and conversion table raw scores are not only seen as interchangeable but also as originating from a common scaling process. In this article, we propose an alternative…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Item Response Theory, Cutting Scores, Scaling
Davis-Becker, Susan L.; Buckendahl, Chad W.; Gerrow, Jack – International Journal of Testing, 2011
Throughout the world, cut scores are an important aspect of a high-stakes testing program because they are a key operational component of the interpretation of test scores. One method for setting standards that is prevalent in educational testing programs--the Bookmark method--is intended to be a less cognitively complex alternative to methods…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Educational Testing, Licensing Examinations (Professions)
Tiffin-Richards, Simon P.; Pant, Hans Anand; Koller, Olaf – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2013
Cut-scores were set by expert judges on assessments of reading and listening comprehension of English as a foreign language (EFL), using the bookmark standard-setting method to differentiate proficiency levels defined by the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). Assessments contained stratified item samples drawn from extensive item…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, English (Second Language), Language Tests, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Kaliski, Pamela K.; Wind, Stefanie A.; Engelhard, George, Jr.; Morgan, Deanna L.; Plake, Barbara S.; Reshetar, Rosemary A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2013
The many-faceted Rasch (MFR) model has been used to evaluate the quality of ratings on constructed response assessments; however, it can also be used to evaluate the quality of judgments from panel-based standard setting procedures. The current study illustrates the use of the MFR model for examining the quality of ratings obtained from a standard…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Models, Standard Setting (Scoring), Science Tests
Skaggs, Gary; Hein, Serge F. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
Judgmental standard setting methods have been criticized for the cognitive complexity of the judgment task that panelists are asked to complete. This study compared two methods designed to reduce this complexity: the yes/no method and the single-passage bookmark method. Two mock standard setting panel meetings were convened, one for each method,…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Methods, Cutting Scores, Experienced Teachers

Peer reviewed
Direct link
