Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 2 |
| Cutting Scores | 2 |
| Equated Scores | 2 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 2 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Estimation (Mathematics) | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Investigations | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Licensing Examinations… | 1 |
| Measurement Objectives | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkStone, Gregory Ethan; Koskey, Kristin L. K.; Sondergeld, Toni A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
Typical validation studies on standard setting models, most notably the Angoff and modified Angoff models, have ignored construct development, a critical aspect associated with all conceptualizations of measurement processes. Stone compared the Angoff and objective standard setting (OSS) models and found that Angoff failed to define a legitimate…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Models, Construct Validity
Peer reviewedNorcini, John; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1991
Effects of numbers of experts (NOEs) and common items (CIs) on the scaling of cutting scores from expert judgments were studied for 11,917 physicians taking 2 forms of a medical specialty examination. Increasing NOEs and CIs reduced error; beyond 5 experts and 25 CIs, error differences were small. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Cutting Scores, Equated Scores, Estimation (Mathematics)
