NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang, Jing; Wang, Lijuan – European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2021
It has been well documented in adults that compared to verbal learning, learning while the subject performs an action is far more effective. However, the results of previous studies involving children have not reached a consensus. The present study examined the action memory of 4- to 6-year-old children under various encoding conditions (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Information Retrieval, Memory, Experiential Learning, Age Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gooda, Theresa – English in Education, 2019
This paper explores the value of writing journals for both students and teachers beyond English lessons and without insistence on evidencing writing progress. Keeping a journal or undertaking regular reflective writing is an unfamiliar experience for some students, and schools may offer limited privacy for writing. Used in a comprehensive school…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Journal Writing, Reflection, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kalish, Charles W. – Developmental Psychology, 2012
Under what conditions will people generalize and remember observed social information? Preschool- (n = 44) and young school-age (n = 46) children and adults (n = 40) heard short vignettes describing characters' actions and motives on a single occasion. Characters were introduced using either proper names or category labels. Test questions asked…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Children, Adults, Preferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ackerman, Brian P. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1987
The goal of this study was to determine some of the factors that contribute to developmental differences children and adults display when they use cues to retrieve specific memories. (PCB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Cues, Individual Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Friedman, William J. – Child Development, 1991
In this study of the distinction between temporal distance and location, children were asked to judge the relative recency and time of target events that occurred one and seven weeks before testing. All judged recency and localized time of day correctly. Six- and eight- but not four-year olds localized longer time scales. (BC)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cues, Individual Development, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Friedman, William J.; And Others – Child Development, 1995
Examined developmental changes in the use of distance-based and calendar-based approaches to estimate the recency of two events. Found that children's ability to discriminate temporal relationships between two events appears by four to five years of age. In contrast, use of calendar information and cognizance of annual patterns was found only in…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Concept Formation, Cues