Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cues | 3 |
| Task Analysis | 3 |
| Auditory Stimuli | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Associative Learning | 1 |
| Auditory Perception | 1 |
| Brain | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Buchner, Axel | 3 |
| Mayr, Susanne | 2 |
| Bell, Raoul | 1 |
| Dentale, Sandra | 1 |
| Meinhardt, Martin J. | 1 |
| Niedeggen, Michael | 1 |
| Pietrowsky, Reinhard | 1 |
| Röer, Jan P. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meinhardt, Martin J.; Bell, Raoul; Buchner, Axel; Röer, Jan P. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
A large body of evidence shows an animacy effect on memory in that animate entities are better remembered than inanimate ones. Yet, the reason for this mnemonic prioritization remains unclear. In the survival processing literature, the assumption that richness of encoding is responsible for adaptive memory benefits has received substantial…
Descriptors: Memory, Prediction, Language Processing, Associative Learning
Mayr, Susanne; Buchner, Axel; Dentale, Sandra – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2009
Three auditory identification experiments were designed to specify the prime-response retrieval model of negative priming (S. Mayr & A. Buchner, 2006), which assumes that the prime response is retrieved in ignored repetition trials and interferes with probe responding. In Experiment 1, shortly before (in Experiment 1A) or after (in Experiment 1B)…
Descriptors: Cues, Motor Reactions, Task Analysis, Error Patterns
Mayr, Susanne; Niedeggen, Michael; Buchner, Axel; Pietrowsky, Reinhard – Cognition, 2003
Negative priming refers to slowed down reactions when the distractor on one trial becomes the target on the next. Following two popular accounts, the effect might be due either to inhibitory processes associated with the frontal cortex, or to an ambiguity in the retrieval of episodic information. We used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Cognitive Processes, Cues, Reaction Time

Peer reviewed
Direct link
