ERIC Number: EJ1461405
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2025-Mar
Pages: 26
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0957 7572
EISSN: EISSN-1573-1804
Available Date: 2024-04-23
Design Criticism and Eye Movement Strategy in Reading: A Comparative Study of Design and Non-Design Students
Yongchun Mao1,2; Shuo Ban3; Guolin Zhang4
International Journal of Technology and Design Education, v35 n1 p257-282 2025
Design criticism plays a crucial role in fostering critical thinking and boosting creativity among design students, highlighting its significance in college design education. Engaging with design-related critical materials is a prevalent approach to strengthen design criticism. This study aims to investigate the eye movement strategies employed by both design and non-design students when reading critical materials, aiming to discern their impact on design criticism. A total of 26 product design students (male = 16, female = 10) and 26 non-design students (male = 11, female = 15) participated in the study. The participants wore eye trackers and read two design proposals with critical viewpoints, followed by a critical report for each proposal. Additionally, they completed the Design Criticism Scale. The study compared differences between design and non-design students, explored correlations among various factors, and conducted a lag sequential analysis of eye movement behaviors. Design students outperformed non-design students in personal insights and self-evaluation of design criticism. Compared to non-design students, design students exhibited a higher focus on the images during reading, as evidenced by more fixations shifting from other regions to the images. The degree of attention to images was positively correlated with personal insights. Design students' design criticism skills were positively correlated with the recall of perspectives, whereas non-design students' design criticism skills were positively associated with personal insights. The focus on images played a pivotal role in the formation of critical thinking. Additionally, the study offers recommendations for enhancing university design education.
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Reading Strategies, Comparative Analysis, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Critical Thinking, Design, College Students, Teaching Methods, Reading Processes, Correlation, Creativity
Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link-springer-com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: 1Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), School of Arts and Design, Jinan, China; 2Universiti Sains Malaysia, School of Distance Education, Penang, Malaysia; 3Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Faculty of Education, Bangi, Malaysia; 4Peking University, College of Architecture and Landscape, Beijing, China