NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scharrer, Lisa; Stadtler, Marc; Bromme, Rainer – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2019
Scientific claims that are connected to ethical concerns are frequently brought forward by communicators who are not ethically neutral. This study investigated how far recipients' evaluation of such claims is guided by vigilance toward a potential ethical source bias rather than their own ethical bias. One hundred ten individuals opposed to…
Descriptors: Ethics, Scientific Research, Bias, Punishment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kienhues, Dorothe; Jucks, Regina; Bromme, Rainer – Educational Psychologist, 2020
Science's role in society is being threatened, as misinterpretation and denial of scientific evidence and the rejection or ignorance of scientific expertise are gaining prominence. This endangered role of science in society is characteristic of post-truthism. To deconstruct this process, we analyze how three potential gateways allow people to…
Descriptors: Ethics, Epistemology, Science Education, Science and Society
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bromme, Rainer; Scharrer, Lisa; Stadtler, Marc; Hömberg, Johanna; Torspecken, Ronja – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015
Scientific texts are a genre in which adherence to specific discourse conventions allows for conclusions on the scientific integrity of the information and thus on its validity. This study examines whether genre-typical features of scientific discourse influence how laypeople handle conflicting science-based knowledge claims. In two experiments…
Descriptors: Discourse Analysis, Climate, Conflict, Lay People
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stadtler, Marc; Scharrer, Lisa; Macedo-Rouet, Monica; Rouet, Jean-François; Bromme, Rainer – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2016
We present an empirical investigation of a classroom training fostering vocational students' consideration of source information when deciding about science-based controversies. The training was specifically aimed at raising students' awareness of the division of cognitive labor and the resulting need to take a source's competence into account…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Pretests Posttests, Consciousness Raising, Credibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomm, Eva; Bromme, Rainer – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2016
When laypeople read controversial scientific information in order to make a personally relevant decision, information on the source is a valuable resource with which to evaluate multiple, competing claims. Due to their bounded understanding, laypeople rely on the expertise of others and need to identify whether sources are credible. The present…
Descriptors: Lay People, Scientific and Technical Information, Information Sources, Controversial Issues (Course Content)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scharrer, Lisa; Britt, M. Anne; Stadtler, Marc; Bromme, Rainer – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
Well-educated laypeople tend to rely on their own ability to evaluate scientific claims when they obtain information from texts with high comprehensibility. The present study investigated whether controversial content reduces this facilitating effect of high text comprehensibility on readers' self-reliance and whether the influence of…
Descriptors: Comprehension, Readability, Medicine, Reading Materials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomm, Eva; Bromme, Rainer – Science Education, 2012
The Internet is a convenient source of information about science-based topics (e.g., health matters). Whereas experts are familiar with the conventions of "true" scientific discourse and the assessment of scientific information, laypeople may have great difficulty choosing among, evaluating, and deciding on the vast amount of information…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Internet, Expertise, Evaluative Thinking