NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 16 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Eyüp Yurt – International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2025
This study aimed to develop and validate the Creative Problem-Solving Skills Test (CPSS-T), grounded in Torrance's creativity theory, to assess these skills in university students. The CPSS-T consists of five open-ended question types, each designed to measure different aspects of creative problem-solving: Alternative Use, Hypothetical Scenario,…
Descriptors: Creativity Tests, Creativity, Creative Thinking, Problem Solving
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
B. Goecke; S. Weiss; B. Barbot – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
The present paper questions the content validity of the eight creativity-related self-report scales available in PISA 2022's context questionnaire and provides a set of considerations for researchers interested in using these indexes. Specifically, we point out some threats to the content validity of these scales (e.g., "creative thinking…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Questionnaires, Content Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Selcuk Acar; Yuyang Shen – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
Creativity tests, like creativity itself, vary widely in their structure and use. These differences include instructions, test duration, environments, prompt and response modalities, and the structure of test items. A key factor is task structure, referring to the specificity of the number of responses requested for a given prompt. Classic…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creative Thinking, Creativity Tests, Task Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rodriguez, Rebekah M.; Silvia, Paul J.; Kaufman, James C.; Reiter-Palmon, Roni; Puryear, Jeb S. – Creativity Research Journal, 2023
The original 90-item Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI) was a landmark self-report scale in creativity research, and the 28-item brief form developed nearly 20 years ago continues to be a popular measure of everyday creativity. Relatively little is known, however, about the psychometric properties of this widely used scale. In the current research,…
Descriptors: Creativity Tests, Creativity, Creative Thinking, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Gerwig, Anne; Miroshnik, Kirill; Forthmann, Boris; Benedek, Mathias; Karwowski, Maciej; Holling, Heinz – Journal of Intelligence, 2021
This paper provides a meta-analytic update on the relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking (DT), as research on this topic has increased, and methods have diversified since Kim's meta-analysis in 2005. A three-level meta-analysis was used to analyze 849 correlation coefficients from 112 studies with an overall N = 34,610. The…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Creative Thinking, Correlation, Age Differences
Peter Organisciak; Selcuk Acar; Denis Dumas; Kelly Berthiaume – Grantee Submission, 2023
Automated scoring for divergent thinking (DT) seeks to overcome a key obstacle to creativity measurement: the effort, cost, and reliability of scoring open-ended tests. For a common test of DT, the Alternate Uses Task (AUT), the primary automated approach casts the problem as a semantic distance between a prompt and the resulting idea in a text…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Creative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jose A. Diaz; Steven M. Nelson; A. Alexander Beaujean; Adam E. Green; Michael K. Scullin – Creativity Research Journal, 2024
The compound Remote Associates Test (RAT) is a classic measure of creativity. Participants are shown three cue words (sore-shoulder-sweat) and asked to generate a word that connects them (cold). Theoretical views of RAT performance differ in the degree to which they conceptualize performance as depending on automatic spreading activation across…
Descriptors: Test Items, Creative Thinking, Creativity Tests, Performance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Selcuk Acar; Denis Dumas; Peter Organisciak; Kelly Berthiaume – Grantee Submission, 2024
Creativity is highly valued in both education and the workforce, but assessing and developing creativity can be difficult without psychometrically robust and affordable tools. The open-ended nature of creativity assessments has made them difficult to score, expensive, often imprecise, and therefore impractical for school- or district-wide use. To…
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Elementary School Students, Artificial Intelligence, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Zainudin, M.; Subali, Bambang; Jailani – International Journal of Instruction, 2019
Mathematical creativity instrument is a tool to assess students' creative thinking skills in solving mathematical problems. Mathematical creativity has a pivotal role in improving the quality of life, solving problems, making a change, and increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of a system. Unfortunately, there is a gap in the assessment of…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Creativity Tests, Mathematics, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yarbrough, Nükhet D. – Creativity Research Journal, 2016
As part of a project to translate and administer the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) to Turkish elementary and secondary students, 35 professionals were trained in a full-day workshop to learn to score the verbal TTCT. All trainees scored the same 4 sets of TTCT verbal criterion tests for fluency, flexibility, and originality by filling…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Item Analysis, Scores, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gliniecka, Martyna – EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2016
Process of communication can be challenging. At first participants must standardize their concepts of things to hold them close enough to others' concepts, then it's crucial to use appropriate expressions to verbalize those concepts to ensure the mutual understanding. Therefore, it can be problematic when cognitive constructs are hard to…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creative Thinking, Questionnaires, Questioning Techniques
Gubbels, Joyce; Segers, Eliane; Keuning, Jos; Verhoeven, Ludo – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2016
The theory of triarchic intelligence posits that, in addition to the widely acknowledged analytical reasoning abilities, creative and practical abilities should be included in the assessments of intellectual capacities and identification of gifted students. To find support for such an approach, the present study examined the psychometric…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Elementary School Students, Correlation, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tan, Chee-Seng; Qu, Li – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2015
Although experimentally induced positive mood can generally last for 20 min and the induced mood is conducive to creative performance, it is still unclear whether the facilitation effect is stable during these 20 min. Two studies were conducted to examine this issue while controlling for the impacts of task switching, practice effect, and test…
Descriptors: Psychological Patterns, Creativity, Test Items, Drills (Practice)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hong, Eunsook; Peng, Yun; O'Neil, Harold F., Jr.; Wu, Junbin – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2013
The study examined the effects of gender and item content of domain-general and domain-specific creative-thinking tests on four subscale scores of creative-thinking (fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration). Chinese tenth-grade students (234 males and 244 females) participated in the study. Domain-general creative thinking was measured…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity Tests, Gender Differences, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang, Kuay-Keng; Lin, Shu-Fen; Hong, Zuway-R; Lin, Huann-shyang – Creativity Research Journal, 2016
The purposes of this study were to (a) develop and validate instruments to assess elementary students' scientific creativity and science inquiry, (b) investigate the relationship between the two competencies, and (c) compare the two competencies among different grade level students. The scientific creativity test was composed of 7 open-ended items…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Elementary School Science, Creativity, Comparative Analysis
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2