Descriptor
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Consumer Protection | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Educational Testing | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| Federal Regulation | 1 |
| Standardized Tests | 1 |
| State Legislation | 1 |
| Testing Programs | 1 |
Source
| Journal of Law and Education | 1 |
Author
| Robertson, Dario F. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRobertson, Dario F. – Journal of Law and Education, 1980
This article will argue that cost-benefit analysis persuasively demonstrates that truth-in-testing laws are socially and economically justified but often fall short of providing a comprehensive regulatory scheme adequate to correct the market dislocations generated by an unregulated testing industry. (Author)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Consumer Protection, Cost Effectiveness, Court Litigation
