Descriptor
| Court Litigation | 4 |
| Equal Protection | 4 |
| Due Process | 2 |
| Legal Problems | 2 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Civil Liberties | 1 |
| Civil Rights | 1 |
| Civil Rights Legislation | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Constitutional Law | 1 |
| Courts | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Emory Law Journal | 1 |
| Journal of College and… | 1 |
| Journal of Law and Education | 1 |
| Update on Law-Related… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Fifth Amendment | 4 |
| Doe v Plyler | 1 |
| United States Constitution | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGarcia y Griego, Manuel – Journal of Law and Education, 1986
Analyzes moral and legal obligations the U.S. has toward undocumented Mexicans in the U.S. Reviews past cases and draws implications regarding the nature and extent of such obligations. Discusses several court decisions regarding the rights of undocumented migrants. Provides an overview of trends in Mexican-US migration. (MD)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Due Process, Economic Factors, Equal Protection
Peer reviewedKelly, Thomas E., Jr. – Journal of College and University Law, 1974
Explores whether the state university student confronted with double prosecution (university disciplinary proceedings and state or municipal criminal proceedings) has any constitutional basis for claiming the applicability of double jeopardy protection of the Fifth Amendment as a bar to a second prosecution. Concludes that the issue is not…
Descriptors: College Students, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Equal Protection
Peer reviewedSaidman, Gary K.; Wright, Nicholas M. – Emory Law Journal, 1976
In the principal case the court admits that evidence of a disproportionate impact is relevant to a showing of racially discriminatory intent. Implications of this finding are discussed. (LBH)
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Due Process
Peer reviewedUpdate on Law-Related Education, 1998
Describes the court case of Chicago v. Morales in which an anti-loitering ordinance challenged the constitutional right of assembly by giving the police the power to disperse anyone associated with gang members in public. Illustrates the importance of retaining Fifth Amendment rights even after pleading guilty in the case of Mitchell v. U.S. (CMK)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Civil Liberties, Civil Rights Legislation, Court Litigation


