Descriptor
| Correlation | 4 |
| Difficulty Level | 4 |
| Mathematical Models | 4 |
| Statistical Studies | 4 |
| Factor Analysis | 3 |
| Item Analysis | 3 |
| Latent Trait Theory | 3 |
| Test Items | 3 |
| Matrices | 2 |
| Measurement Techniques | 2 |
| Psychometrics | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 3 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Reckase, Mark D.; And Others – 1985
Factor analysis is the traditional method for studying the dimensionality of test data. However, under common conditions, the factor analysis of tetrachoric correlations does not recover the underlying structure of dichotomous data. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the factor analyses of tetrachoric correlations is unlikely to…
Descriptors: Correlation, Difficulty Level, Factor Analysis, Item Analysis
Muraki, Eiji – 1984
The TESTFACT computer program and full-information factor analysis of test items were used in a computer simulation conducted to correct for the guessing effect. Full-information factor analysis also corrects for omitted items. The present version of TESTFACT handles up to five factors and 150 items. A preliminary smoothing of the tetrachoric…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Computer Software, Correlation
Zwick, Rebecca – 1986
Although perfectly scalable items rarely occur in practice, Guttman's concept of a scale has proved to be valuable to the development of measurement theory. If the score distribution is uniform and there is an equal number of items at each difficulty level, both the elements and the eigenvalues of the Pearson correlation matrix of dichotomous…
Descriptors: Correlation, Difficulty Level, Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory
Tucker, Ledyard R.; And Others – 1986
A Monte Carlo study of five indices of dimensionality of binary items used a computer model that allowed sampling of both items and people. Five parameters were systematically varied in a factorial design: (1) number of common factors from one to five; (2) number of items, including 20, 30, 40, and 60; (3) sample sizes of 125 and 500; (4) nearly…
Descriptors: Correlation, Difficulty Level, Educational Research, Expectancy Tables


