NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Location
China1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chakraborty, Deya; Soyoof, Ali; Moharami, Mehdi; Utami, Ade Dwi; Zeng, Shaoru; Cong-Lem, Ngo; Hradsky, Danielle; Maestre, Jacky-Lou; Foomani, Elham M.; Pretorius, Lynette – Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 2021
Objective: While academic writing is considered a core competency in academia, academic writing anxiety is ubiquitous in doctoral student cohorts. Doctoral writing groups provide a space for participants to learn from each other's writing through the peer feedback process. In this conceptual review, we explore the dialogic nature of the peer…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Academic Language, Writing (Composition), Doctoral Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Mimi, Ed.; Zhang, Meixiu, Ed. – Language Learning & Language Teaching, 2023
This book is the first edited volume to compile up-to-date scholarship that discusses frontier knowledge on second language (L2) collaborative writing (CW) and highlights technology-mediated solutions to it. The volume consists of conceptual papers and empirical studies that explore theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical approaches to CW in…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Teaching Methods, Collaborative Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shi, Zhan; Liu, Fengkai; Lai, Chun; Jin, Tan – Language Learning & Technology, 2022
Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) systems have been found to enhance the accuracy, readability, and cohesion of writing responses (Stevenson & Phakiti, 2019). Previous research indicates that individual learners may have difficulty utilizing content-based AWE feedback and collaborative processing of feedback might help to cope with this…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meishar-Tal, Hagit; Schencks, Mat – International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 2010
This paper discusses the pedagogical and technological aspects of assessing wiki-based collaborative learning activities. The first part of the paper presents a general framework of collaborative learning assessment. The framework is based on four aspects of assessment, characterized by four questions: who, what, how and by whom. The second part…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Writing, Web Sites, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Passig, David; Schwartz, Gali – International Journal on E-Learning, 2007
Students in higher education, most frequently, use the frontal approach while being asked to collaborate on a writing assignment. However, the difficulty in collaborative writing using conventional technologies such as pen and paper, board or computer is the limited ability to view the work of your peers during the process (Baeker, Glass,…
Descriptors: Writing Skills, Writing Evaluation, Writing Assignments, Graduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haber, Marian Wynne – Journalism Educator, 1994
Discusses various aspects of collaborative writing and advocates its use in college journalism courses. (SR)
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Cooperative Learning, Higher Education, Journalism Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baker, Tracey – Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1991
Discusses a course on shared-document writing in which students indicate that they value the time allowed to coordinate groups and to understand and complete assignments. Asserts that structuring the course necessitates assigning work relating to a single topic and providing choices, including a voice in group formation and evaluation. (PRA)
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Cooperative Learning, Group Activities, Higher Education
Herrmann, Andrea W. – 1989
Writing instruction reflects a growing appreciation of the value of talk. By implementing peer writing groups, teachers encourage students to give, seek, and react to oral feedback among themselves as they write, in addition to reacting to the teacher's traditional comments on finished papers. Collaboration in writing groups provides writers with…
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Computer Assisted Instruction, Cooperative Learning, Peer Evaluation