Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Control Groups | 2 |
| English (Second Language) | 2 |
| Error Correction | 2 |
| Experimental Groups | 2 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Intermode Differences | 2 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Computer Mediated… | 1 |
| Educational Practices | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Argentina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAbuSeileek, Ali; Abualsha'r, Awatif – Language Learning & Technology, 2014
This study investigated the effect of using computer-mediated corrective feedback on EFL learners' performance in writing. Sixty-four intermediate-level learners were randomly assigned to either a no-feedback control condition or a corrective feedback, including three treatment conditions. The first is the "track changes" feature of…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Error Correction
Download full textMorra, Ana Maria; Asis, Maria Ines – Journal of College Reading and Learning, 2009
Providing feedback is one of the foreign language writing teacher's most important tasks (Ferris, 2007). However there is less certainty about the techniques that should be used (K. Hyland & F. Hyland, 2006). This article reports on research that investigated the effects of two types of teacher feedback, on-tape and written, and of the absence…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Instruction, Teaching Methods, Intermode Differences
