Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Instruction | 2 |
| Content Area Writing | 2 |
| Interrater Reliability | 2 |
| Writing Assignments | 2 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| College Instruction | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Computer Software Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Alexander, R. Curby | 1 |
| Ferster, Bill | 1 |
| Hammond, Thomas C. | 1 |
| Liang, Jyh-Chong | 1 |
| Lyman, Hunt | 1 |
| Tsai, Chin-Chung | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkFerster, Bill; Hammond, Thomas C.; Alexander, R. Curby; Lyman, Hunt – Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 2012
The hurried pace of the modern classroom does not permit formative feedback on writing assignments at the frequency or quality recommended by the research literature. One solution for increasing individual feedback to students is to incorporate some form of computer-generated assessment. This study explores the use of automated assessment of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Scripts, Formative Evaluation, Essays
Liang, Jyh-Chong; Tsai, Chin-Chung – Internet and Higher Education, 2010
This study used an online peer assessment activity to help 47 college students to learn biology through writing. Each student submitted a biology writing report to an online system and then experienced three rounds of peer assessment. During the online peer assessment process, self, peer and expert evaluation scores for the writing were gathered…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Validity, Biology, Science Instruction
