Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Content Area Reading | 4 |
| Readability Formulas | 4 |
| Science Education | 4 |
| Textbook Evaluation | 3 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Readability | 2 |
| Reading Research | 2 |
| Science Instruction | 2 |
| Textbook Selection | 2 |
| Textbooks | 2 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| American Biology Teacher | 1 |
| Canadian Journal of Education | 1 |
| Journal of Agronomic Education | 1 |
| Journal of Research in… | 1 |
Author
| Ciampa, Katia | 1 |
| Fazio, Xavier | 1 |
| Fribourg, Henry A. | 1 |
| Gallagher, Tiffany | 1 |
| Graveel, John G. | 1 |
| Haney, Richard E. | 1 |
| Spiegel, Dixie Lee | 1 |
| Vachon, Myra K. | 1 |
| Wright, Jill D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gallagher, Tiffany; Fazio, Xavier; Ciampa, Katia – Canadian Journal of Education, 2017
Science curriculum standards were mapped onto various texts (literacy readers, trade books, online articles). Statistical analyses highlighted the inconsistencies among readability formulae for Grades 2-6 levels of the standards. There was a lack of correlation among the readability measures, and also when comparing different text sources. Online…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Readability, Textbooks, Science Education
Peer reviewedWright, Jill D.; Spiegel, Dixie Lee – American Biology Teacher, 1984
Discusses findings from a questionnaire survey of 622 biology teachers on: (1) how accurately they can judge readability of instructional materials; (2) what factors they consider when judging readability levels; and (3) if they considered differences in students' reading ability when selecting reading materials for them to use. (JN)
Descriptors: Biology, Content Area Reading, High Schools, Readability
Peer reviewedVachon, Myra K.; Haney, Richard E. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1991
The objectives of this study were to develop a method for scoring the level of abstraction (LOA) of science reading material and explore its relationship with other methods for assessing curriculum materials. LOA is defined as the ratio of the nonconcrete concepts to the total number of concepts in a written passage expressed as a percent.…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Content Area Reading, Developmental Stages, Educational Research
Graveel, John G.; Fribourg, Henry A. – Journal of Agronomic Education, 1987
Reported is a study designed to determine whether reading grade level (RGL) assessment techniques used for elementary and secondary education textbooks would discriminate among plant and soil science textbooks. The study was to select the RGL indices suited to quantify the readability of these sources, and to identify the factors affecting…
Descriptors: Agronomy, College Science, Content Analysis, Content Area Reading


