Descriptor
| Content Analysis | 6 |
| Readability | 6 |
| Textbook Selection | 6 |
| Textbook Evaluation | 5 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Textbook Content | 3 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Readability Formulas | 2 |
| Reading Research | 2 |
| Textbooks | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Anderson, Thomas H. | 1 |
| Armbruster, Bonnie B. | 1 |
| Gillen, Barry | 1 |
| Hollabaugh, Mark | 1 |
| Jones, Karen H. | 1 |
| Lindsey, Jimmy D. | 1 |
| Querashi, M. Y. | 1 |
| Zulli, Michael R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedQuerashi, M. Y.; Zulli, Michael R. – Teaching of Psychology, 1975
Twenty-five introductory college psychology textbooks are analyzed for terms most frequently used, the textbooks which employed the largest number of frequently used terms; similarity among textbooks; and the relationship between readability and technical thoroughness of the texts. (Author/JR)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Higher Education, Psychology, Readability
Jones, Karen H. – 1993
A study examined 58 home economics education textbooks in terms of reading difficulty, writing style, and interest level for special population learners. The objective was to identify texts, using six different readability formulas that were significantly more difficult and provided educational obstacles to special populations in their preparation…
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Home Economics, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedGillen, Barry; And Others – Teaching of Psychology, 1977
Twenty-seven social psychology textbooks were rated for Flesch readability, student readability, Flesch interest, student interest, and student recommendation. (ND)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewedLindsey, Jimmy D.; And Others – Reading Improvement, 1979
Reports that introductory textbooks about special education used at the college level differ in readability and that the cloze procedure can be used as an objective measure to use in selecting these textbooks. (FL)
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Content Analysis, Higher Education, Preservice Teacher Education
Peer reviewedHollabaugh, Mark – Journal of College Science Teaching, 1989
Provides step-by-step procedures for developing an index which uses the Gunning Fog technique to evaluate the level of reading difficulty of textbooks. Cites examples, illustrations, and several warnings in the discussion. (RT)
Descriptors: College Science, Content Analysis, Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods
Armbruster, Bonnie B.; Anderson, Thomas H. – 1981
Focusing on what authors can do to facilitate learning from content area textbooks, this report labels authors as "considerate," providing text that readers can understand with a minimum of cognitive effort, or as "inconsiderate," creating text that requires a conscientious, highly skilled effort if readers are to comprehend…
Descriptors: Authors, Check Lists, Cognitive Processes, Coherence


