Descriptor
| College Faculty | 4 |
| Computer Software Reviews | 4 |
| Computer Uses in Education | 4 |
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Menu Driven Software | 4 |
| Performance Based Assessment | 4 |
| Teacher Salaries | 4 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 3 |
| Merit Pay | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Speech Communication | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ACA Bulletin | 4 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedClevenger, Theodore, Jr. – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Describes the Salary Model, a menu-driven software package that allows administrators to compare quickly and easily the activities of one faculty member to those of other faculty member. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computer Software Reviews, Computer Uses in Education, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewedPadgett, Steven B. – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Reviews the Salary Model program, a menu-driven software package that allows administrators to compare activities of one faculty member to those of other faculty members. Concludes that the program can be an effective tool in the evaluation process. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computer Software Reviews, Computer Uses in Education, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewedSmith, Robert M. – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Highlights rationales for having systematic merit salary administration, and presents guidelines for introducing such a system. Discusses using the Salary Model (a menu-driven software package that allows administrators to compare activities of one faculty member to others) as one aspect of a merit salary system. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computer Software Reviews, Computer Uses in Education, Higher Education
Peer reviewedRobinette, Dan – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Describes how Florida State University used the Salary Model, a menu-driven software package that allows administrators to compare activities of one faculty member to others. Discusses several theoretical and pragmatic concerns that should be addressed when using the program. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computer Software Reviews, Computer Uses in Education, Faculty Evaluation
