Publication Date
| In 2026 | 3 |
| Since 2025 | 240 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1373 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2831 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4821 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 7218 |
| Foreign Countries | 2054 |
| Test Construction | 1112 |
| Student Evaluation | 1067 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1061 |
| Test Items | 1058 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1053 |
| Educational Technology | 905 |
| Comparative Analysis | 835 |
| Scores | 832 |
| Higher Education | 825 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 182 |
| Researchers | 146 |
| Teachers | 122 |
| Policymakers | 40 |
| Administrators | 36 |
| Students | 15 |
| Counselors | 9 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Media Staff | 3 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
Location
| Australia | 170 |
| United Kingdom | 153 |
| Turkey | 126 |
| China | 117 |
| Germany | 108 |
| Canada | 106 |
| Spain | 94 |
| Taiwan | 89 |
| Netherlands | 73 |
| Iran | 72 |
| United States | 68 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 4 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 4 |
| Does not meet standards | 5 |
Glas, C. A. W. – 2003
In computerized adaptive testing, updating item parameter estimates using adaptive testing data is often called online calibration. This study investigated how to evaluate whether the adaptive testing data used for online calibration sufficiently fit the item response model used. Three approaches were investigated, based on a Lagrange multiplier…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Response Theory, Quality Control
Leung, Chi-Keung; Chang, Hua-Hua; Hau, Kit-Tai – 2000
Information based item selection methods in computerized adaptive tests (CATs) tend to choose the item that provides maximum information at an examinee's estimated trait level. As a result, these methods can yield extremely skewed item exposure distributions in which items with high "a" values may be overexposed, while those with low…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Selection, Simulation
Deng, Hui; Chang, Hua-Hua – 2001
The purpose of this study was to compare a proposed revised a-stratified, or alpha-stratified, USTR method of test item selection with the original alpha-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing approach (STR) and the use of maximum Fisher information (FSH) with respect to test efficiency and item pool usage using simulated computerized…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks, Selection
Papanastasiou, Elena C. – 2002
Due to the increased popularity of computerized adaptive testing (CAT), many admissions tests, as well as certification and licensure examinations, have been transformed from their paper-and-pencil versions to computerized adaptive versions. A major difference between paper-and-pencil tests and CAT, from an examinees point of view, is that in many…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Review (Reexamination)
Chen, Shu-Ying; Ankenmann, Robert D.; Spray, Judith A. – 1999
This paper presents a derivation of an average between-test overlap index as a function of the item exposure index, for fixed-length computerized adaptive tests (CAT). This relationship is used to investigate the simultaneous control of item exposure at both the item and test levels. Implications for practice as well as future research are also…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks, Test Items
Patelis, Thanos – College Entrance Examination Board, 2000
Because different types of computerized tests exist and continue to emerge, the term "computer-based testing" does not encompass all of the various models that may exist. As a result, test delivery model (TDM) is used to describe the variety of methods that exist in delivering tests to examinees. The criterion that is used to distinguish…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Models, Delivery Systems
Peer reviewedDavis, Laurie Laughlin; Pastor, Dena A.; Dodd, Barbara G.; Chiang, Claire; Fitzpatrick, Steven J. – Journal of Applied Measurement, 2003
Examined the effectiveness of the Sympson-Hetter technique and rotated content balancing relative to no exposure control and no content rotation conditions in a computerized adaptive testing system based on the partial credit model. Simulation results show the Sympson-Hetter technique can be used with minimal impact on measurement precision,…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Selection, Simulation
Peer reviewedZwick, Rebecca; Thayer, Dorothy T. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2002
Used a simulation to investigate the applicability to computerized adaptive test data of a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis method. Results show the performance of this empirical Bayes enhancement of the Mantel Haenszel DIF analysis method to be quite promising. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Bias
Peer reviewedDivgi, D. R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
Two methods for estimating the reliability of a computerized adaptive test (CAT) without using item response theory are presented. The data consist of CAT and paper-and-pencil scores from identical or equivalent samples, and scores for all examinees on one or more covariates, using the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. (TJH)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Estimation (Mathematics), Predictive Validity
Peer reviewedCampbell, Keith A.; Rohlman, Diane S.; Storzbach, Daniel; Binder, Laurence M.; Anger, W. Kent; Kovera, Craig A.; Davis, Kelly L.; Grossman, Sandra J. – Assessment, 1999
Administered 12 psychological and 7 neurobehavioral performance tests twice to nonclinical normative samples of 30 adults (computer format only) and 30 adults (computer and conventional administration) with one week between administrations. Results suggest that individual test-retest reliability is not affected when tests are administered as part…
Descriptors: Adults, Computer Assisted Testing, Neuropsychology, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewedWendt, Anne – Popular Measurement, 1999
Discusses the factors affecting the decision to use computerized adaptive testing in a nursing certification examination. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Testing, Licensing Examinations (Professions), Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedSekula-Wacura, Renata – Popular Measurement, 2000
Studied the effects of answer review on results of a computerized adaptive test, the laboratory professional examination of the American Society of Clinical Pathologists. Results from 29,293 candidates show that candidates who changed answers were more likely to improve their scores. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Medical Laboratory Assistants, Review (Reexamination)
Peer reviewedStocking, Martha L.; Ward, William C.; Potenza, Maria T. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Explored, using simulations, the use of disclosed items on continuous testing conditions under a worse-case scenario that assumes that disclosed items are always answered correctly. Some item pool and test designs were identified in which the use of disclosed items produces effects on test scores that may be viewed as negligible. (Author/MAK)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks
Peer reviewedVispoel, Walter P. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2000
Addresses the issue of using computers in educational and psychological assessment. Results support the comparability of scores yielded by computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the third edition of the Self-Description Questionnaire and respondents' preferences for computerized assessment. (Contains 47 references and 3 tables.) (Author/GCP)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Measurement Techniques, Measures (Individuals), Self Concept Measures
Peer reviewedvan der Linden, Wim J.; Glas, Cees A. W. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2000
Performed a simulation study to demonstrate the dramatic impact of capitalization on estimation errors on ability estimation in adaptive testing. Discusses four different strategies to minimize the likelihood of capitalization in computerized adaptive testing. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Estimation (Mathematics)


