Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Standardized Tests | 2 |
| Test Length | 2 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Delivery Systems | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Advanced Placement… | 1 |
| Preliminary Scholastic… | 1 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVeldkamp, Bernard P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2016
Many standardized tests are now administered via computer rather than paper-and-pencil format. The computer-based delivery mode brings with it certain advantages. One advantage is the ability to adapt the difficulty level of the test to the ability level of the test taker in what has been termed computerized adaptive testing (CAT). A second…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Reaction Time, Standardized Tests, Difficulty Level
Download full textLuecht, Richard M.; Sireci, Stephen G. – College Board, 2011
Over the past four decades, there has been incremental growth in computer-based testing (CBT) as a viable alternative to paper-and-pencil testing. However, the transition to CBT is neither easy nor inexpensive. As Drasgow, Luecht, and Bennett (2006) noted, many design engineering, test development, operations/logistics, and psychometric changes…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Technology, Evaluation Methods
