NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Journal of Educational…119
Audience
Researchers2
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 119 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ikkyu Choi; Matthew S. Johnson – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Automated scoring systems provide multiple benefits but also pose challenges, notably potential bias. Various methods exist to evaluate these algorithms and their outputs for bias. Upon detecting bias, the next logical step is to investigate its cause, often by examining feature distributions. Recently, Johnson and McCaffrey proposed an…
Descriptors: Prediction, Bias, Automation, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yi-Ling Wu; Yao-Hsuan Huang; Chia-Wen Chen; Po-Hsi Chen – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Multistage testing (MST), a variant of computerized adaptive testing (CAT), differs from conventional CAT in that it is adapted at the module level rather than at the individual item level. Typically, all examinees begin the MST with a linear test form in the first stage, commonly known as the routing stage. In 2020, Han introduced an innovative…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Format, Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Grochowalski, Joseph H.; Hendrickson, Amy – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
Test takers wishing to gain an unfair advantage often share answers with other test takers, either sharing all answers (a full key) or some (a partial key). Detecting key sharing during a tight testing window requires an efficient, easily interpretable, and rich form of analysis that is descriptive and inferential. We introduce a detection method…
Descriptors: Identification, Cooperative Learning, Cheating, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
He, Yinhong; Qi, Yuanyuan – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
In multidimensional computerized adaptive testing (MCAT), item selection strategies are generally constructed based on responses, and they do not consider the response times required by items. This study constructed two new criteria (referred to as DT-inc and DT) for MCAT item selection by utilizing information from response times. The new designs…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Luyang Fang; Gyeonggeon Lee; Xiaoming Zhai – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Machine learning-based automatic scoring faces challenges with imbalanced student responses across scoring categories. To address this, we introduce a novel text data augmentation framework that leverages GPT-4, a generative large language model specifically tailored for imbalanced datasets in automatic scoring. Our experimental dataset consisted…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Artificial Intelligence, Automation, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jing Huang; Yuxiao Zhang; Jason W. Morphew; Jayson M. Nissen; Ben Van Dusen; Hua Hua Chang – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Online calibration estimates new item parameters alongside previously calibrated items, supporting efficient item replenishment. However, most existing online calibration procedures for Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing (CD-CAT) lack mechanisms to ensure content balance during live testing. This limitation can lead to uneven…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Cognitive Measurement, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harold Doran; Testsuhiro Yamada; Ted Diaz; Emre Gonulates; Vanessa Culver – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Computer adaptive testing (CAT) is an increasingly common mode of test administration offering improved test security, better measurement precision, and the potential for shorter testing experiences. This article presents a new item selection algorithm based on a generalized objective function to support multiple types of testing conditions and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Algorithms
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peter Baldwin; Victoria Yaneva; Kai North; Le An Ha; Yiyun Zhou; Alex J. Mechaber; Brian E. Clauser – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Recent developments in the use of large-language models have led to substantial improvements in the accuracy of content-based automated scoring of free-text responses. The reported accuracy levels suggest that automated systems could have widespread applicability in assessment. However, before they are used in operational testing, other aspects of…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Scoring, Computational Linguistics, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kylie Gorney; Mark D. Reckase – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
In computerized adaptive testing, item exposure control methods are often used to provide a more balanced usage of the item pool. Many of the most popular methods, including the restricted method (Revuelta and Ponsoda), use a single maximum exposure rate to limit the proportion of times that each item is administered. However, Barrada et al.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Banks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mingfeng Xue; Yunting Liu; Xingyao Xiao; Mark Wilson – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Prompts play a crucial role in eliciting accurate outputs from large language models (LLMs). This study examines the effectiveness of an automatic prompt engineering (APE) framework for automatic scoring in educational measurement. We collected constructed-response data from 930 students across 11 items and used human scores as the true labels. A…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Prompting, Educational Assessment, Automation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Han, Suhwa; Kang, Hyeon-Ah – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
The study presents multivariate sequential monitoring procedures for examining test-taking behaviors online. The procedures monitor examinee's responses and response times and signal aberrancy as soon as significant change is identifieddetected in the test-taking behavior. The study in particular proposes three schemes to track different…
Descriptors: Test Wiseness, Student Behavior, Item Response Theory, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wallace N. Pinto Jr.; Jinnie Shin – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
In recent years, the application of explainability techniques to automated essay scoring and automated short-answer grading (ASAG) models, particularly those based on transformer architectures, has gained significant attention. However, the reliability and consistency of these techniques remain underexplored. This study systematically investigates…
Descriptors: Automation, Grading, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ersen, Rabia Karatoprak; Lee, Won-Chan – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
The purpose of this study was to compare calibration and linking methods for placing pretest item parameter estimates on the item pool scale in a 1-3 computerized multistage adaptive testing design in terms of item parameter recovery. Two models were used: embedded-section, in which pretest items were administered within a separate module, and…
Descriptors: Pretesting, Test Items, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yuan, Lu; Huang, Yingshi; Li, Shuhang; Chen, Ping – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
Online calibration is a key technology for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and has been widely used in various forms of CAT, including unidimensional CAT, multidimensional CAT (MCAT), CAT with polytomously scored items, and cognitive diagnostic CAT. However, as multidimensional and polytomous assessment data become more…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Computation, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tahereh Firoozi; Hamid Mohammadi; Mark J. Gierl – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate a multilingual automated essay scoring (AES) system for grading essays in three languages. Two different sentence embedding models were evaluated within the AES system, multilingual BERT (mBERT) and language-agnostic BERT sentence embedding (LaBSE). German, Italian, and Czech essays were…
Descriptors: College Students, Slavic Languages, German, Italian
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8