Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Ability Identification | 18 |
| Comparative Testing | 18 |
| Adaptive Testing | 6 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 6 |
| Intelligence Tests | 6 |
| Test Validity | 5 |
| Children | 4 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Test Construction | 4 |
| Test Items | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Bloom, Allan S. | 1 |
| Boland, L. | 1 |
| Bracken, Bruce A. | 1 |
| Busse, Thomas V. | 1 |
| Dumont, Ron | 1 |
| Fabiano, Leah | 1 |
| Freeman, James | 1 |
| Goldstein, Brian | 1 |
| Harrison, Patti L. | 1 |
| Henly, Susan J. | 1 |
| Iglesias, Aquiles | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 13 |
| Journal Articles | 8 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 5 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Counselors | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 5 |
| Differential Aptitude Test | 2 |
| British Ability Scales | 1 |
| Kaufman Assessment Battery… | 1 |
| McCarthy Scales of Childrens… | 1 |
| Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wim J. van der Linden; Luping Niu; Seung W. Choi – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2024
A test battery with two different levels of adaptation is presented: a within-subtest level for the selection of the items in the subtests and a between-subtest level to move from one subtest to the next. The battery runs on a two-level model consisting of a regular response model for each of the subtests extended with a second level for the joint…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Test Construction, Test Format, Test Reliability
Sarah Stevens – ProQuest LLC, 2021
Early identification of at-risk students is a critical element of Response to Intervention (RTI) but there are few validated universal screeners for high school mathematics. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the screening system currently in use at one urban Texas public high school and compared its effectiveness to alternate screening…
Descriptors: Urban Schools, Public Schools, High School Students, At Risk Students
Peer reviewedSevier, Robert; And Others – Roeper Review, 1994
Thirty-five gifted elementary children were tested with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III (WISC-III) and results were compared to a previous administration of the WISC (Revised). Scores were significantly higher on all three WISC-R global scales and most subtest scaled scores. Correlation coefficients between the tests were…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Testing, Correlation, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedSchoel, Doris R.; Busse, Thomas V. – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Ability Identification, College Freshmen, Comparative Testing, Creativity
Peer reviewedPrasse, David P.; Bracken, Bruce A. – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Significant differences were found between the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised mean standard scores and Verbal, Performance, and Full Scale IQs. The PPVT-R did not correlate significantly with the WISC-R scales or subtests, suggesting the tests are measuring different abilities. (Author)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Children, Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests
Freeman, James; and others – Educ Sci Int J, 1969
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Admission Criteria, Architectural Education, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewedHenly, Susan J.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
A group of covariance structure models was examined to ascertain the similarity between conventionally administered and computerized adaptive versions of the Differential Aptitude Test (DAT). Results for 332 students indicate that the computerized version of the DAT is an adequate representation of the conventional test battery. (TJH)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Goldstein, Brian; Fabiano, Leah; Iglesias, Aquiles – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2004
Purpose: Research examining the relationship between spontaneous and imitated productions for phonological analysis has indicated that the inclusion of imitated productions may overestimate children's phonological abilities. Previous research in this area has included only English-speaking children. The purpose of this study was to determine what,…
Descriptors: Spanish Speaking, Speech Impairments, Children, Imitation
Peer reviewedBloom, Allan S.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
WISC-Rs and Stanford-Binets were administered to 50 children with developmental disabilities referred for comprehensive evaluations. Fifty-four percent of the children received different classifications using the two instruments. Different classifications of intellectual level may be derived for the same child depending upon which test is used.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicapped Children
Wise, Steven L.; And Others – 1991
According to item response theory (IRT), examinee ability estimation is independent of the particular set of test items administered from a calibrated pool. Although the most popular application of this feature of IRT is computerized adaptive (CA) testing, a recently proposed alternative is self-adapted (SA) testing, in which examinees choose the…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, College Students, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewedHarrison, Patti L.; Naglieri, Jack A. – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Scores on Kaufman's (1977) McCarthy short form and the McCarthy Screening Test (1978) were obtained for first graders (N=53). As follow-up nine months later, the Metropolitan Achievement Test was administered. Results showed Kaufman's short form scores usually indicated a smaller number of false negatives than did McCarthy Screening Test scores.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Measurement, Comparative Testing, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedDumont, Ron; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1996
Administered an ability scale to 53 children identified as having a learning disability approximately three years after each had been administered an intelligence scale. Results indicate that the ability scale correlated highly with the intelligence test. Differences in scores in specific measures were nonsignificant. Other findings are discussed.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adolescents, Children, Comparative Analysis
Roos, Linda L.; And Others – 1992
Computerized adaptive (CA) testing uses an algorithm to match examinee ability to item difficulty, while self-adapted (SA) testing allows the examinee to choose the difficulty of his or her items. Research comparing SA and CA testing has shown that examinees experience lower anxiety and improved performance with SA testing. All previous research…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Algebra, Algorithms
Lunz, Mary E.; And Others – 1990
This study explores the test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests of varying lengths. The testing model used was designed as a mastery model to determine whether an examinee's estimated ability level is above or below a pre-established criterion expressed in the metric (logits) of the calibrated item pool scale. The Rasch model was used…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, College Students, Comparative Testing
Lyon, Mark A.; Smith, Douglas K. – 1986
This study examined agreement rates between identified strengths and weaknesses in shared abilities and influences on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). Sixty-seven students in the first through seventh grades referred for learning disabilities (LD) evaluation were…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Elementary Education
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
