NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1,351 to 1,365 of 1,943 results Save | Export
Ediger, Marlow – 2001
It is difficult to know the information that should be included on state report cards to enable comparisons among school districts and among different states. There may be many problems with such report cards, ranging from the possibility of computer error to the chance of reporting test scores that are not reliable or valid or the use of tests…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Reliability
Foster, Merle A. – Bureau of Education, Department of the Interior, 1926
The plan adopted in this study has been: (1) to make a correlation between the ranking of the various States in each of the items compared; and (2) to compare the various States with each other directly with a reference to the mean of the entire United States in those items. The Pearson coefficient of correlation points out the approximate degree…
Descriptors: Illiteracy, Correlation, Reputation, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Eysenck, H. J.; Castle, M. – Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Art Appreciation, Artists, Comparative Analysis, Design Preferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ferris, Kenneth R.; Aranya, Nissim – Personnel Psychology, 1983
Examined the scale characteristics of two measures of organizational commitment. Using data from l,l05 accountants, findings indicated that while both instruments exhibited a high degree of internal reliability, the Porter et al. (1947) instrument exhibited significantly greater predictive validity with respect to intended turnover than the…
Descriptors: Accountants, Comparative Analysis, Employee Attitudes, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vinsonhaler, John F.; And Others – Reading Research Quarterly, 1983
Discusses a series of six studies that investigated the performance of 66 reading and learning disabilities specialists and classroom teachers who diagnosed simulated reading or learning disability cases and suggested remediation plans. Results indicate that both commonality and individual agreement among participants was very low. (AEA)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Individual Differences, Learning Disabilities, Reading Consultants
Edwards, Dee – Teaching at a Distance, 1982
Difficulties inherent in grading individual student projects are highlighted in a study of five teachers' differential grading. Among the issues addressed are the reliability of the grading (agreement of teachers), effect of knowledge of the student on grading, grading criteria, and influence of grading schemes provided for the teachers. (MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Extension Education, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Green, Kathy; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
Achievement test reliability and validity as a function of ability were determined for multiple sections of a large undergraduate French class. Results did not support previous arguments that decreasing the number of options results in a more efficient test for high-level examinees, but less efficient for low-level examinees. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Maloney, Michael P.; Glasser, Anne – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1982
Evaluated the reliability and validity of objective scoring procedures on the Draw-A-Person Test. Subjects were mentally retarded persons, psychotics, and normals. Reliability estimates for both scales ranged from .42 to .78. Positive evidence indicates that overall quality does relate to overall level of psychological adjustment. (Author)
Descriptors: Clinical Psychology, Comparative Analysis, Emotional Adjustment, Mental Retardation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Huynh, Huynh; Saunders, Joseph C. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1980
Single administration (beta-binomial) estimates for the raw agreement index p and the corrected-for-chance kappa index in mastery testing are compared with those based on two test administrations in terms of estimation bias and sampling variability. Bias is about 2.5 percent for p and 10 percent for kappa. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement, Mastery Tests, Mathematical Models
Hanna, Gerald S.; And Others – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1981
Compared Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 and coefficient alpha (by blocks) reliability estimates for a reading comprehension test. On the average, K-R 20 exceeded coefficient alpha by about .05; that is, K-R 20 exaggerated the internal consistency of the test as would be expected from theory. Implications for counseling interpretations are discussed.…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bennett, Randy Elliot; And Others – Special Services in the Schools, 1988
A study of Scholastic Aptitude Test scores for nine groups of students with disabilities taking special test administrations found differences in score levels among disability groups but no significant differences of measurement precision and no evidence of disadvantage for disabled students. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Disabilities
Scott, Randall L.; And Others – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1989
The psychometric integrity of a short form of the Questionnaire on Resources and Stress was evaluated, based on data provided by 66 mothers and 66 fathers of 33 handicapped and 33 nonhandicapped preschool children. Alpha reliability, factor structure, and construct validity analyses indicated that the measure has reasonable psychometric integrity.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Disabilities, Evaluation Methods, Fathers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lyon, Mark A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1995
This study examined differences between Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) scores for 40 elementary students with learning disabilities. WISC-III Full Scale, Verbal, and Performance scores were lower than comparable WISC-R scores by one-third to one-half a…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Disability Identification, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Byrne, Brian; Fielding-Barnsley, Ruth – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1993
Reports on the development of a test of phonemic awareness suitable for administration to young children. Compares kindergarteners' performance on a measure controlling for global similarity and another measure not controlled. Finds support for the importance of controlling for global similarity when attempting to measure phoneme invariance. (RS)
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Comparative Analysis, Phonemes, Phonemic Awareness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fink, Dieter; Laupase, Ricky – Internet Research, 2000
Compares the perceptions of Malaysians and Australians for four Web site design characteristics--atmospherics, news stories, signs, and products and services--as part of the integrated Internet marketing model. Hypothesizes that the predominant culture is not generalized to another culture, discusses validity and reliability, and suggest further…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cultural Differences, Foreign Countries, Hypothesis Testing
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  87  |  88  |  89  |  90  |  91  |  92  |  93  |  94  |  95  |  ...  |  130