Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 12 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 114 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 375 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1130 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1943 |
| Reliability | 880 |
| Test Reliability | 792 |
| Foreign Countries | 554 |
| Test Validity | 443 |
| Correlation | 350 |
| Validity | 332 |
| Interrater Reliability | 327 |
| Statistical Analysis | 321 |
| Scores | 280 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 236 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Reckase, Mark D. | 6 |
| Attali, Yigal | 5 |
| Coniam, David | 5 |
| Brennan, Robert L. | 4 |
| Crehan, Kevin D. | 4 |
| Feldt, Leonard S. | 4 |
| Hakstian, A. Ralph | 4 |
| Jones, Ian | 4 |
| Kolen, Michael J. | 4 |
| Lunz, Mary E. | 4 |
| August, Diane | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 35 |
| Practitioners | 29 |
| Teachers | 15 |
| Administrators | 9 |
| Policymakers | 6 |
| Counselors | 2 |
| Media Staff | 2 |
| Parents | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 59 |
| United States | 47 |
| Australia | 36 |
| China | 33 |
| Canada | 32 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 32 |
| United Kingdom | 28 |
| Germany | 25 |
| Netherlands | 24 |
| Taiwan | 22 |
| Hong Kong | 20 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewedGriffore, Robert J. – Journal of Personality Assessment, 1977
Three fear of success measures correlated positively with the Alpert Haber Debilitating Anxiety Scale. Correlations between the Pappo Fear of Success Questionnaire (FOS) and the Zuckerman and Allison Fear of Success Scale (FOSS) were significant and positive. The Horner Scoring System was not significantly correlated with the FOS or FOSS. (EVH)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Failure, Fear
Halpin, Gerald; And Others – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1978
Super's Work Values Inventory is utilized in making interindividual and intraindividual comparative interpretations of work values. Internal consistency reliability coefficients for 15 scales and reliabilities of differences between scores on scales were of such a weak magnitude that caution in making interindividual and intrindividual comparisons…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, High School Students, Research Projects, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedBardo, John – Sociology and Social Research, 1976
Describing the possible effects of using pre-built attitude scales in cross-cultural research, this paper tests the validity of certain assumptions underlying use of pre-constructed Likert-type attitude scales on populations other than the one on which the scale was constructed. (Author/JC)
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Comparative Analysis, Cross Cultural Studies, Cultural Differences
Salvia, Shawn Amig; Salvia, John – Diagnostique, 1986
Significant differences were found between college freshmen science (N=50) and nonscience (N=50) majors who were administered the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Revised (WAIS-R) and the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery, Part II: Tests of Achievement. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, College Freshmen, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Peer reviewedGibbs, John C.; And Others – Child Development, 1984
A recognition measure of Kohlbergian moral reasoning, developed on the basis of a production measure, was psychometrically evaluated. Results showed that the Sociomoral Reflection Objective Measure has acceptable concurrent validity and high levels of test-retest reliability and internal consistency. (Author/CI)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Children, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedPang, Lee Yick – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1984
Examines and contests the claim that all language tests are in reality testing the same underlying ability which is very similar to the Spearman g-factor for intelligence. Conclusions indicate that the argument for the existence of a g-factor in language tests is not tenable on statistical grounds. (SL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Intelligence, Language Proficiency, Language Tests
Peer reviewedZimmerman, Donald W.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1984
Three types of test were compared: a completion test, a matching test, and a multiple-choice test. The completion test was more reliable than the matching test, and the matching test was more reliable than the multiple-choice test. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement, Higher Education, Mathematical Models
Hess, Joseph W. – J Med Educ, 1969
In a comparison of two systems used for evaluating the skills of medical students in relating to patients, the one utilizing interaction analysis yielded more reliable ratings and seems to have potential as an instructional method. The other system used traditional types of judgments registered on a 10-point continuum. Both systems were used with…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedMcConnell, Campbell – Journal of Economic Education, 1983
The Flesch reading formula is questioned as being appropriate for evaluating college economics textbooks. The Dale-Chall, Modified Dale-Chall, Fry, and Flesch formulas were used to evaluate nine introductory textbooks. There was little or no consistency in either the absolute reading levels or the rank orderings. (Author/AM)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Economics Education, Educational Research, Higher Education
Peer reviewedStiggins, Richard J. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1982
Compares direct and indirect writing assessment strategies and contrasts them in terms of the relationship each has to specific classroom decision-making situations, the components of writing assessed, practical testing matters, characteristics of test exercises, test scoring procedures, and procedures for determining test quality. (HOD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Educational Assessment, Test Format
Turner, Carol J.; Record, Albert L. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1981
Evaluated the reliability and convergent validity of three rating scales designed to measure self-concept clarity. The ratings of self, peer, and professional judges were compared. Results supported that a basic difference exists between a participant's self-reported constructs and an observer's judgment of that participant's constructs.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewedNewmark, Charles S. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1981
Provides a brief synopsis of the utility of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) short forms with psychiatric, medical and normal samples. Strengths and limitations of each MMPI short form are discussed. (Author)
Descriptors: Clinical Psychology, Comparative Analysis, Diagnostic Tests, Personality Measures
Drummond, Robert J.; McIntire, Walter G. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1977
This article examines the factor structure of two measures of self-concept routinely used with elementary school children: the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory and the Self-Concept and Motivation Inventory. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Self Concept
Peer reviewedSchinka, John A.; LaLone, Leif – Psychological Assessment, 1997
To study deviations from U.S. population demographics in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 restandardization sample, validity, clinical, content, and supplementary scale comparisons were performed between the restandardization sample and a census-matched subsample. Results indicate that deviations from population demographic…
Descriptors: Census Figures, Comparative Analysis, Demography, Norms
Peer reviewedBandalos, Deborah L. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1997
Monte Carlo methods were used to study the accuracy and utility of estimators of overall error and error due to approximation in structural equation modeling. Effects of sample size, indicator reliabilities, and degree of misspecification were examined. The rescaled noncentrality parameter also was examined. Choosing among competing models is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Monte Carlo Methods


