Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 5 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 8 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 14 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 64 |
| Distinctive Features… | 64 |
| Phonology | 25 |
| English | 15 |
| English (Second Language) | 15 |
| Vowels | 15 |
| Language Patterns | 13 |
| Second Language Learning | 13 |
| Contrastive Linguistics | 12 |
| Foreign Countries | 12 |
| Consonants | 11 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 36 |
| Reports - Research | 33 |
| Information Analyses | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 3 |
| Researchers | 3 |
| Teachers | 2 |
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| Belgium | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| Canada | 1 |
| Connecticut | 1 |
| India | 1 |
| Iran | 1 |
| Italy | 1 |
| Nepal | 1 |
| Netherlands | 1 |
| Philippines | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWerker, Janet F. – Applied Psycholinguistics, 1986
Attempts to determine whether broadened linguistic experience facilitates cross-language phonetic sensitivity to a novel speech contrast. Multilingual adults and monolingual English speaking adults were compared on their ability to make phonetic distinctions not found in their respective native languages. Broad, nonspecific linguistic experience…
Descriptors: Adults, Audiolingual Skills, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception
Peer reviewedHamilton, Harley – Sign Language Studies, 1984
Thirty-five deaf children with hearing parents were tested for cheremic perception. Deaf children using sign language, like hearing children using spoken language, have more difficulty discriminating between lexical items that form minimal pairs in their language than between items that differ more. (SL)
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Comparative Analysis, Deafness, Distinctive Features (Language)
Peer reviewedSeward, B. H. – English Language Teaching, 1972
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cursive Writing, Distinctive Features (Language), English (Second Language)
Peer reviewedBlack, Steven D.; And Others – Discourse Processes, 1983
Compares discourse in several different media and finds that strict sequentiality is not a universal feature of discourse. Concludes that discourse in nonreal time media, such as electronic message systems, has multiple threads. (FL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Distinctive Features (Language)
Peer reviewedWoodward, James – Sign Language Studies, 1987
Describes single finger sign contact in data from ten different sign languages. The relative frequencies of signs using each of the four possible fingers are examined. Proposes distinctive features to explain the differences in frequency and use of these handshapes in sign languages in general. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Comparative Analysis, Distinctive Features (Language), English
Roberge, Claude – Revue de Phonetique Appliquee, 1971
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Descriptive Linguistics, Distinctive Features (Language), Linguistic Theory
Williamson, Leon E. – 1972
Using the counting features in previous mean length of utterance (MLU) studies, a study of the active vocabularies of adolescents looked at seven concrete features of the words 104 seventh grade and 100 eleventh grade subjects gave in response to 10 pictures. Each subject wrote five words for each of the pictures, which were analyzed for number of…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Developmental Stages, Distinctive Features (Language), Grade 11
Peer reviewedHenly, Elizabeth; Sheldon, Amy – Language Learning, 1986
Examination of the role of duration in the perception of phonemic contrast (English /r/-/l/) by Cantonese speakers (N=5) showed that increased duration was not sufficient to facilitate perception; differences in the perception of the two sounds by Japanese and Cantonese speakers were partially explained by differences in the phonological…
Descriptors: Acoustic Phonetics, Articulation (Speech), Cantonese, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedKubler, Cornelius C. – Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1986
A dialect survey of the Penghu Islands concluded that the Penghu dialects belong to the Southern Min; variation within the dialects is considerable in terms of changed tones, certain finals, and some lexical items; and the Penghu dialects can be further divided into two large groups. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Chinese, Comparative Analysis, Distinctive Features (Language), Foreign Countries
Jeffery Pittam; John Ingram – Applied Psycholinguistics, 1992
Comparison of Vietnamese-Australians' perception and production of the English compound-phrasal contrast with that of native English-speaking Australians indicated that the number of syllables and consonant clusters alien to Vietnamese phonology and length of residence in Australia were major factors affecting the Vietnamese-Australians'…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Distinctive Features (Language), English (Second Language), Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedReed, Carol E. – TESOL Quarterly, 1973
Revised version of a paper presented to the 1972 TESOL Convention in Washington, D.C. (DD)
Descriptors: Black Dialects, Comparative Analysis, Distinctive Features (Language), English (Second Language)
Peer reviewedGoswami, Usha – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2002
Describes phonological sensitivity at different grain sizes as a good predictor of reading acquisition in all languages. Presents information on development of phonological sensitivity for syllables, onsets, and rimes. Illustrates that phoneme-level skills develop fastest in children acquiring orthographically consistent languages with simple…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Beginning Reading, Children, Comparative Analysis
Giri, Ram Ashish – 1987
British English and Nepali monophthongs (pure vowels) are analyzed and compared in terms of their distinctive features, and pedagogical implications for Nepali learners of English as a Second Language are discussed. First, the two vowel systems are outlined and described in terms of eight distinctive features: vowel height, backness, lip rounding,…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Contrastive Linguistics, Distinctive Features (Language), English (Second Language)
Peer reviewedLongacre, Robert E. – Discourse Processes, 1989
Uses eight languages in five distinct linguistic areas to examine two hypotheses regarding text generation and analysis and to illustrate their reciprocity relative to narrative discourse. Demonstrates how these hypotheses yield salience schemes and constituent analysis which mutually corroborate and correct each other. (KEH)
Descriptors: American Indian Languages, Comparative Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Discourse Modes
Ladefoged, Peter; And Others – 1968
Of the approximately 40 languages in Uganda, some are very similar to one another and may be to some extent mutually intelligible. Because no one knows how to measure degrees of mutual intelligibility, the authors are attempting to establish reliable techniques which would be not only of practical value for the study of language problems in…
Descriptors: African Languages, Comparative Analysis, Computational Linguistics, Data Analysis

Direct link
