Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 18 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 54 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 203 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 286 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 286 |
| Reading Comprehension | 117 |
| Reading Skills | 109 |
| Reading Difficulties | 91 |
| Elementary School Students | 82 |
| Word Recognition | 78 |
| Foreign Countries | 72 |
| Reading Instruction | 65 |
| Reading Fluency | 51 |
| Intervention | 50 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Vaughn, Sharon | 7 |
| Fletcher, Jack M. | 5 |
| Compton, Donald L. | 4 |
| Barth, Amy E. | 3 |
| Beach, Kristen D. | 3 |
| Binder, Katherine S. | 3 |
| Cirino, Paul T. | 3 |
| Francis, David J. | 3 |
| Gilbert, Jennifer K. | 3 |
| Greenberg, Daphne | 3 |
| Roberts, Greg | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 98 |
| Grade 1 | 37 |
| Early Childhood Education | 34 |
| Primary Education | 32 |
| Grade 2 | 28 |
| Kindergarten | 26 |
| Grade 3 | 23 |
| Middle Schools | 20 |
| Grade 4 | 19 |
| Secondary Education | 19 |
| Grade 5 | 13 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
| Researchers | 7 |
| Practitioners | 4 |
Location
| Canada | 12 |
| Sweden | 10 |
| Texas | 9 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 7 |
| Connecticut | 5 |
| Italy | 5 |
| Netherlands | 5 |
| United States | 5 |
| Greece | 4 |
| Israel | 4 |
| China | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 5 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 8 |
| Does not meet standards | 5 |
Peer reviewedGoswami, Usha – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1986
Compares the ability of children at three different levels to use analogy in reading both real and nonsense words. Shows young children can successfully use analogy to decode new words. (HOD)
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Comparative Analysis, Decoding (Reading), Language Patterns
Peer reviewedShu, Hua; Anderson, Richard C. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1997
Finds that third and fifth graders were able to select characters containing the correct radicals (a component of Chinese characters that provides information about the character's meaning) even when the characters as a whole were unfamiliar to them. Finds that good readers displayed more awareness of radicals than poor readers. (RS)
Descriptors: Chinese, Comparative Analysis, Decoding (Reading), Elementary Education
Peer reviewedJoseph, Laurice M. – Reading Research and Instruction, 2000
Compares the effectiveness of word box instruction and word sort instruction on 42 first-grade children's phonemic awareness, word identification, and spelling performance. Finds significant differences favoring (1) word box instruction over traditional instruction on all measures except spelling; and (2) word sort instruction over traditional…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decoding (Reading), Grade 1, Instructional Effectiveness
Wu, Xiaoying; Anderson, Richard C. – Literacy Teaching and Learning, 2007
The purpose of this study was to examine the character identification strategies of Chinese children during their oral reading of a continuous text. Eighteen second graders' oral reading of a story, as well as an interview about their decoding strategies, were audiotaped and transcribed. The results generally converged with those of previous oral…
Descriptors: Reading Research, Oral Reading, Metalinguistics, Written Language
Harrison, Gina L.; Beres, Deborah – Exceptionality Education Canada, 2007
Writing samples were examined from 42 post-secondary students with or without writing difficulties. Guided by the Simple View of Writing (Berninger et al., 2002), the samples were examined for evidence of difficulties with lower-order transcription processes and higher-order composition skills. Retrospective reports on writing strategies were also…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Writing Skills, Writing Processes, Writing Strategies
Peer reviewedPerin, Dolores – Applied Psycholinguistics, 1982
Good and poor readers, 15- and 16-year-olds and adult literacy students, were compared in their ability to produce graphemic representations for four specific phonemes. Good readers were significantly better than poor readers at representing the critical phonemes, but intentional ambiguity had a similar effect on all. (MSE)
Descriptors: Adult Students, Comparative Analysis, Decoding (Reading), Error Patterns
Peer reviewedJuel, Connie – Reading Research Quarterly, 1980
Conditions were examined in which second and third graders used context to identify words. The data indicated that good readers were predominantly text-driven, while poor readers used more context clues. (MKM)
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Analysis, Context Clues, Decoding (Reading)
Fletcher, James M. – ACEHI Journal, 1991
This study, involving 59 disabled and nondisabled adolescent readers, tested A. Kennedy's "spatial map" hypothesis wherein spatial sequencing ability is important in lexical reaccess under high-demand text situations alone. Tests of the variance contributions of a spatial sequencing covariate to eye movement dependent measures of reading, across…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Comparative Analysis, Decoding (Reading), Difficulty Level
Miller, Justin; Schwanenflugel, Paula J. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2006
Prosodic, or expressive, reading is considered to be one of the essential features of the achievement of reading fluency. The purpose of this study was to determine (a) the degree to which the prosody of syntactically complex sentences varied as a function of reading speed and accuracy and (b) the role that reading prosody might play in mediating…
Descriptors: Suprasegmentals, Sentences, Oral Reading, Young Children
Guron, Louise Miller; Lundberg, Ingvar – Dyslexia, 2004
A comparative investigation of word reading efficiency indicates that different strategies may be used by English and Swedish early readers. In a first study, 328 native English speakers from UK Years 3 and 6 completed a pen-and-paper word recognition task (the "Wordchains" test). Results were analysed for frequency and type of errors…
Descriptors: Error Patterns, Word Recognition, Primary Education, Decoding (Reading)
DeMelo, Hermes T.; And Others – 1981
This study of 96 high school biology students investigates the effectiveness of visual instruction composed of simple line drawings and printed words as compared to printed-words-only instruction, visual tests, and the interaction between visual or non-visual mode of instruction and mode of testing. The subjects were randomly assigned to be given…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decoding (Reading), Imagery, Instructional Materials
Perfetti, Charles A. – 1981
The relationship between speech and print is essentially asymmetrical and changes as the reading ability of the child improves. For the child who has succeeded at decoding, the asymmetry implies that commonalities between speech and print are more important than their differences. Three hypothetical observation points illustrate the similarity…
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Comparative Analysis, Decoding (Reading), Elementary Education
Kamil, Michael L.; Pearson, P. David – New York University Education Quarterly, 1979
In the bottom-up model of the reading process, the reader's first task is to decode the symbols into sound representations. By contrast, the top-down model assumes that the reader begins by guessing about the meaning of some unit of print. Each model suggests different instructional practices. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Decoding (Reading), Educational Theories
Nichols, William Dee; And Others – 1997
The influence of word recognition and conceptual knowledge on readers' comprehension of narrative text has become a fundamental assumption associated with text processing in the primary grades. Features of conceptual knowledge such as prior knowledge, content knowledge, domain knowledge, and discourse knowledge are believed to be significant…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decoding (Reading), Grade 4, Grade 5
Peer reviewedEhri, Linnea C.; Wilce, Lee S. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1985
Using kindergarten subjects, a study examined whether prereaders learned better with visual cues while novice readers learned better with phonetic cues. (HOD)
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Comparative Analysis, Cues, Decoding (Reading)

Direct link
