NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
ERIC Number: EJ1483608
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2025
Pages: 16
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-2147-0901
EISSN: EISSN-2564-8020
Available Date: 0000-00-00
Comparative Analysis of Mobile Applications and Traditional Methods in Vocabulary Acquisition
Educational Process: International Journal, v17 Article e2025322 2025
Background/purpose: This study provides a comparative review of mobile applications and traditional classroom methods in English vocabulary acquisition. It explores whether mobile-assisted vocabulary learning (MAVL) results in better retention, engagement, and productive vocabulary use among ESL learners. The study also aims to identify underlying theories supporting each method and assess learner preferences across diverse contexts. Materials/methods: A theoretical, narrative literature review was conducted by analyzing peer-reviewed articles published between 2018 and 2025. Studies were retrieved from databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar using keywords including "mobile learning," "ESL," and "vocabulary acquisition." The review applied strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, focusing on research comparing MAVL with traditional methods, and employed thematic synthesis of learner profiles, research design, outcomes, and theoretical frameworks such as spaced repetition, dual coding, and self-Conclusion. Mobile applications offer significant advantages in ESL vocabulary acquisition, particularly in terms of retention, motivation, and learner autonomy. Yet, to fully develop productive skills and contextual understanding, these tools should be integrated into traditional classroom instruction. Future research should focus on long-term retention, productive language use, and adaptive hybrid models to optimize vocabulary learning outcomes.regulated learning. Results: Findings indicate that mobile applications often lead to superior vocabulary retention and learner engagement, largely due to multimedia features, spaced repetition, and gamification. However, traditional methods remain strong in developing productive vocabulary skills through contextual and teacher-mediated instruction. In several cases, a blended approach combining both methods yielded the most effective outcomes. Conclusion: Mobile applications offer significant advantages in ESL vocabulary acquisition, particularly in terms of retention, motivation, and learner autonomy. Yet, to fully develop productive skills and contextual understanding, these tools should be integrated into traditional classroom instruction. Future research should focus on long-term retention, productive language use, and adaptive hybrid models to optimize vocabulary learning outcomes.
UNIVERSITEPARK Limited. iTOWER Plaza (No61, 9th floor) Merkez Mh Akar Cd No3, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey 34382. e-mail: editor@edupij.com; Web site: http://www.edupij.com/
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Information Analyses
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A