Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 4 |
| Protocol Analysis | 4 |
| Writing Research | 4 |
| Writing Processes | 3 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 2 |
| Second Language Instruction | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Writing Skills | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Classroom Techniques | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Asia-Pacific Education… | 1 |
| English Language Education | 1 |
| Research and Teaching in… | 1 |
| Research in the Teaching of… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Books | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| China | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Yang, Chengsong; Zhang, Lawrence Jun – English Language Education, 2023
This book addresses the validity of think-aloud protocols (TAPs) in L2 writing research through a mixed methods study and proposes effective approaches for their valid implementation. The book uncovers the reactive effects that TAPs have on L2 writing performance and processes, and examines how individual factors moderate this reactivity. It…
Descriptors: Protocol Analysis, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Writing Instruction
Yang, Chengsong – Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2019
This paper reports on a qualitative study that explored the veridicality (i.e., the completeness and accuracy) of think-aloud protocols (TAPs) in English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) writing and illustrates how retrospective verbal reports (RVRs) compensated for TAPs in understanding online revision. Forty-three Chinese sophomores, upon writing…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewedBest, Linda – Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 1996
Reviews cognitive research on writing, focusing on differences between expert and novice writers. Discusses a study of verbal comments made during writing by four developmental and four college-level writers. Indicates that college-level writers expressed more context-based knowledge and more positive self-evaluations than developmental writers.…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Cognitive Processes, College Freshmen, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedLutz, Jean A. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1987
Uses text processing (computer) and pen and paper protocols to compare the revising process of professional writers and experienced writers (PhD students). Concludes tentatively that (1) professional and experienced writers do not differ in their approach; (2) the interaction between human and machine influences the writing process; and (3) that…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Editing, Expository Writing

Direct link
