Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Chapelle, Carol A. | 1 |
| Crick, Ruth | 1 |
| Enright, Mary K. | 1 |
| Huang, Shaofu | 1 |
| Hubert Annen | 1 |
| Jamieson, Joan | 1 |
| Klaus Jonas | 1 |
| Kutlu, Omer | 1 |
| Ozdemir, Hasan Fehmi | 1 |
| Peter Lucas Stöckli | 1 |
| Philippe Goldammer | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Turkey (Ankara) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPhilippe Goldammer; Peter Lucas Stöckli; Yannik Andrea Escher; Hubert Annen; Klaus Jonas – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
Indirect indices for faking detection in questionnaires make use of a respondent's deviant or unlikely response pattern over the course of the questionnaire to identify them as a faker. Compared with established direct faking indices (i.e., lying and social desirability scales), indirect indices have at least two advantages: First, they cannot be…
Descriptors: Identification, Deception, Psychological Testing, Validity
Download full textOzdemir, Hasan Fehmi; Kutlu, Omer; Huang, Shaofu; Crick, Ruth – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2022
The aim of this study is to adapt the Crick Learning for Resilient Agency (CLARA) to Turkish culture, and to examine the psychometric features of the Inventory according to both Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). In this respect, it is a descriptive level survey design research. Two different study groups were formed in…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Psychometrics, English (Second Language), English Literature
Chapelle, Carol A.; Enright, Mary K.; Jamieson, Joan – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2010
Drawing on experience between 2000 and 2007 in developing a validity argument for the high-stakes Test of English as a "Foreign Language[TM]" (TOEFL[R]), this paper evaluates the differences between the argument-based approach to validity as presented by "Kane (2006)" and that described in the 1999 "AERA/APA/NCME Standards for Educational and…
Descriptors: Psychological Testing, Validity, High Stakes Tests, English (Second Language)
