NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Stocking, Martha L. – 1996
The interest in the application of large-scale computerized adaptive testing has served to focus attention on issues that arise when theoretical advances are made operational. Some of these issues stem less from changes in testing conditions and more from changes in testing paradigms. One such issue is that of the order in which questions are…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Wilcox, Rand R. – 1978
Two fundamental problems in mental test theory are to estimate true score and to estimate the amount of error when testing an examinee. In this report, three probability models which characterize a single test item in terms of a population of examinees are described. How these models may be modified to characterize a single examinee in terms of an…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement, Mathematical Models
Merz, William R. – 1980
Several methods of assessing test item bias are described, and the concept of fair use of tests is examined. A test item is biased if individuals of equal ability have different probabilities of attaining the item correct. The following seven general procedures used to examine test items for bias are summarized and discussed: (1) analysis of…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis, Mathematical Models
Choppin, Bruce; And Others – 1982
A detailed description of five latent structure models of achievement measurement is presented. The first project paper, by David L. McArthur, analyzes the history of mental testing to show how conventional item analysis procedures were developed, and how dissatisfaction with them has led to fragmentation. The range of distinct conceptual and…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baker, Frank B.; Al-Karni, Ali – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1991
Two methods of computing test equating coefficients under item response theory by the following authors are compared: (1) B. H. Loyd and H. D. Hoover (1980); and (2) M. L. Stocking and F. M. Lord (1983). Conditions under which the method of Stocking and Lord is preferable are described. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Equated Scores
Witt, Elizabeth A. – 1993
Two previous meta-analyses of the test-coaching literature have yielded conclusions that differ with respect to aptitude test scores. This study attempts to resolve differences in the conclusions of these two analyses by J. A. Kulik, R. L. Bangert-Drowns, and C. L. C. Kulik (1984) and K. Pearlman (1984) by using the methods of F. L. Schmidt and J.…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education