Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 6 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 12 |
| Test Items | 12 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 10 |
| Cutting Scores | 5 |
| Scoring | 5 |
| Standards | 5 |
| Difficulty Level | 4 |
| Test Content | 4 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Interrater Reliability | 3 |
| Judges | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Meridian Corporation | 3 |
| Educational Sciences: Theory… | 1 |
| Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
| Eurasian Journal of… | 1 |
| International Research in… | 1 |
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
| ProQuest LLC | 1 |
Author
| Baldwin, Peter | 1 |
| Bourke, Terri | 1 |
| Chang, Lei | 1 |
| Clauser, Jerome C. | 1 |
| Dogan, Celal Deha | 1 |
| Garrido, Mariquita | 1 |
| Gelbal, Selahattin | 1 |
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 1 |
| Lane, Rod | 1 |
| Miller, Eva R. | 1 |
| Ozarkan, Hatun Betul | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 6 |
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Guides - General | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| United States Medical… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
New Meridian Corporation, 2020
New Meridian Corporation has developed the "Quality Testing Standards and Criteria for Comparability Claims" (QTS). The goal of the QTS is to provide guidance to states that are interested in including content from the New Meridian item bank and intend to make comparability claims with "other assessments" that include New…
Descriptors: Testing, Standards, Comparative Analysis, Guidelines
New Meridian Corporation, 2020
New Meridian Corporation has developed the "Quality Testing Standards and Criteria for Comparability Claims" (QTS). The goal of the QTS is to provide guidance to states that are interested in including content from the New Meridian item bank and intend to make comparability claims with "other assessments" that include New…
Descriptors: Testing, Standards, Comparative Analysis, Guidelines
Ozarkan, Hatun Betul; Dogan, Celal Deha – Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2020
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the cut scores obtained by the Extended Angoff and Contrasting Groups methods for an achievement test consisting of constructed-response items. Research Methods: This study was based on survey research design. In the collection of data, the study group of the research consisted of eight mathematics teachers for…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Responses, Test Items, Cutting Scores
New Meridian Corporation, 2020
New Meridian Corporation has developed the "Quality Testing Standards and Criteria for Comparability Claims" (QTS) to provide guidance to states that are interested in including New Meridian content and would like to either keep reporting scores on the New Meridian Scale or use the New Meridian performance levels; that is, the state…
Descriptors: Testing, Standards, Comparative Analysis, Test Content
Clauser, Jerome C.; Hambleton, Ronald K.; Baldwin, Peter – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
The Angoff standard setting method relies on content experts to review exam items and make judgments about the performance of the minimally proficient examinee. Unfortunately, at times content experts may have gaps in their understanding of specific exam content. These gaps are particularly likely to occur when the content domain is broad and/or…
Descriptors: Scores, Item Analysis, Classification, Decision Making
Sorensen, Henry L. – ProQuest LLC, 2013
Cut-score setting processes are used to establish the passing standards for all kinds of tests in education and for credentialing. While experts use their best efforts to guide cut-score setting processes to generate valid and reliable results, cut-score participants often have a difficult time understanding the standard at which the cut score is…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level
Lane, Rod; Bourke, Terri – International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 2017
A recent editorial in International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education (IRGEE) highlighted an opportunity for the inclusion of geography as a subject in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) tests. At present, TIMSS tests only encompass mathematics and physical sciences. The IRGEE editors encouraged…
Descriptors: International Assessment, Geography Instruction, Educational Opportunities, Research Projects
Çetin, Sevda; Gelbal, Selahattin – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2013
In this research, the cut score of a foundation university was re-calculated with bookmark method and with Angoff method, each of which is a standard setting method; and the cut scores found were compared with the current proficiency score. Thus, the final cut score was found to be 27.87 with the cooperative work of 17 experts through the Angoff…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Comparative Analysis, Cutting Scores, Correlation
Peer reviewedPlake, Barbara S.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1994
The comparability of Angoff-based item ratings on a general education test battery made by judges from within-content and across-content domains was studied. Results with 26 college faculty judges indicate that, at least for some tests, item ratings might be essentially equivalent regardless of judge's content specialty. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, General Education, Higher Education
Webb, Melvin W., II; Miller, Eva R. – 1995
As constructed-response items become an integral part of educational assessments, setting student performance standards on constructed-response items has become an important issue. Two standard-setting methods, one used for setting standards on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in reading in grade 8 and the other used to set…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Constructed Response, Criteria, Educational Assessment
Chang, Lei – 1996
It was hypothesized that, when compared to the Angoff method (W. H. Angoff, 1971), the Nedelsky method (L. Nedelsky, 1954) for standard setting had lower intrajudge inconsistency, lower cutscores, and lower cutscores especially for items presenting challenges to the judges. These hypotheses were tested and supported in a sample of 22 graduate…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cutting Scores, Difficulty Level, Distractors (Tests)
Garrido, Mariquita; Payne, David A. – 1987
Minimum competency cut-off scores on a statistics exam were estimated under four conditions: the Angoff judging method with item data (n=20), and without data available (n=19); and the Modified Angoff method with (n=19), and without (n=19) item data available to judges. The Angoff method required free response percentage estimates (0-100) percent,…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores

Direct link
