NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)1
Since 2007 (last 20 years)1
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mohammed, M. A.; Ibrahim, A. I. N.; Siri, Z.; Noor, N. F. M. – Sociological Methods & Research, 2019
In this article, a numerical method integrated with statistical data simulation technique is introduced to solve a nonlinear system of ordinary differential equations with multiple random variable coefficients. The utilization of Monte Carlo simulation with central divided difference formula of finite difference (FD) method is repeated n times to…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Calculus, Sampling, Simulation
Luh, Wei-Ming; Olejnik, Stephen – 1990
Two-stage sampling procedures for comparing two population means when variances are heterogeneous have been developed by D. G. Chapman (1950) and B. K. Ghosh (1975). Both procedures assume sampling from populations that are normally distributed. The present study reports on the effect that sampling from non-normal distributions has on Type I error…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Mathematical Models, Power (Statistics), Sample Size
Blankmeyer, Eric – 1992
L-scaling is introduced as a technique for determining the weights in weighted averages or scaled scores for T joint observations on K variables. The technique is so named because of its formal resemblance to the Leontief matrix of mathematical economics. L-scaling is compared to several widely-used procedures for data reduction, and the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Equations (Mathematics), Mathematical Models, Multivariate Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Alf, Edward F., Jr.; Abrahams, Norman M. – Psychometrika, 1975
In applied and experimental research, it has been demonstrated that the extreme groups procedure is more powerful than the standard correlational approach for some values of the correlation and extreme group size. Methods are provided for using the covariance information that is usually discarded in the classical extreme groups approach.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Experimental Groups, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levy, Kenneth J. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1979
Dunnett's procedure for comparing K-1 treatments with a control is discussed within the context of three nonparametric models: those of Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman, and Cochran. (Author/MH)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Mathematical Models, Nonparametric Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wilcox, Rand R. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1990
Recently, C. E. McCulloch (1987) suggested a modification of the Morgan-Pitman test for comparing the variances of two dependent groups. This paper demonstrates that there are situations where the procedure is not robust. A subsample approach, similar to the Box-Scheffe test, and the Sandvik-Olsson procedure are also assessed. (TJH)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Equations (Mathematics), Error of Measurement, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hakstian, Ralph A.; Skakun, Ernest N. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1976
Populations of factorially simple and complex data were generated with first the oblique and orthogonal factor models, and then solutions based on special cases of the general orthomax criterion were compared on the basis of these characteristics. The results are discussed and implications noted. (DEP)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis, Mathematical Models, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blair, R. Clifford; Higgins, J. J. – Florida Journal of Educational Research, 1984
R. V. Hopkins (1982) has criticized the use of means as the unit of analysis in situations where intact groups, such as classes, rather than individuals have been randomly assigned to various treatment conditions. Instead, Hopkins advocated the use of certain analysis of variance (ANOVA) models that, as far as test for treatment effects are…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Classrooms, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levin, Joel R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
A set procedure developed in this study is useful in determining sample size, based on specification of linear contrasts involving certain formula treatments. (Author/DEP)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Mathematical Models, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Penfield, Douglas A.; Koffler, Stephen L. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1978
Three nonparametric alternatives to the parametric Bartlett test are presented for handling the K-sample equality of variance problem. The two-sample Siegel-Tukey test, Mood test, and Klotz test are extended to the multisample situation by Puri's methods. These K-sample scale tests are illustrated and compared. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berger, Martjin P. F. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1991
A generalized variance criterion is proposed to measure efficiency in item-response-theory (IRT) models. Heuristic arguments are given to formulate the efficiency of a design in terms of an asymptotic generalized variance criterion. Efficiencies of designs for one-, two-, and three-parameter models are compared. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Efficiency, Equations (Mathematics), Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kolen, Michael J.; Whitney, Douglas R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
The adequacy of equipercentile, linear, one-parameter (Rasch), and three-parameter logistic item-response theory procedures for equating 12 forms of five tests of general educational development were compared. Results indicated the equating method adequacy depends on a variety of factors such as test characteristics, equating design, and sample…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Equated Scores, Equivalency Tests
Reckase, Mark D. – 1978
Five comparisons were made relative to the quality of estimates of ability parameters and item calibrations obtained from the one-parameter and three-parameter logistic models. The results indicate: (1) The three-parameter model fit the test data better in all cases than did the one-parameter model. For simulation data sets, multi-factor data were…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Item Analysis, Mathematical Models
Fyans, Leslie J., Jr. – 1978
Unlike the past models guiding cross-cultural psychological research, a new paradigm facilitates multiple level investigations by incorporating both culture-specific (nested) and culture-general (crossed) independent variables within its partially-hierarchical framework. Based upon the generalizability analysis, this model generates sequential…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Bayesian Statistics, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis
Reckase, Mark D. – 1977
Latent trait model calibration procedures were used on data obtained from a group testing program. The one-parameter model of Wright and Panchapakesan and the three-parameter logistic model of Wingersky, Wood, and Lord were selected for comparison. These models and their corresponding estimation procedures were compared, using actual and simulated…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Aptitude Tests, Comparative Analysis
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2