NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ravesloot, C. J.; Van der Schaaf, M. F.; Muijtjens, A. M. M.; Haaring, C.; Kruitwagen, C. L. J. J.; Beek, F. J. A.; Bakker, J.; Van Schaik, J.P.J.; Ten Cate, Th. J. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2015
Formula scoring (FS) is the use of a don't know option (DKO) with subtraction of points for wrong answers. Its effect on construct validity and reliability of progress test scores, is subject of discussion. Choosing a DKO may not only be affected by knowledge level, but also by risk taking tendency, and may thus introduce construct-irrelevant…
Descriptors: Scoring Formulas, Tests, Scores, Construct Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Plucker, Jonathan A.; Qian, Meihua; Schmalensee, Stephanie L. – Creativity Research Journal, 2014
In recent years, the social sciences have seen a resurgence in the study of divergent thinking (DT) measures. However, many of these recent advances have focused on abstract, decontextualized DT tasks (e.g., list as many things as you can think of that have wheels). This study provides a new perspective by exploring the reliability and validity…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity Tests, Scoring Formulas, Evaluation Methods
Green, Bert F., Jr. – 1972
The use of Guttman weights in scoring tests is discussed. Scores of 2,500 men on one subtest of the CEED-SAT-Verbal Test were examined using cross-validated Guttman weights. Several scores were compared, as follows: Scores obtained from cross-validated Guttman weights; Scores obtained by rounding the Guttman weights to one digit, ranging from 0 to…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Reliability, Scoring Formulas, Test Results
Tollefson, Nona; Chung, Jing-Mei – 1986
Procedures for correcting for guessing and for assessing partial knowledge (correction-for-guessing, three-decision scoring, elimination/inclusion scoring, and confidence or probabilistic scoring) are discussed. Mean scores and internal consistency reliability estimates were compared across three administration and scoring procedures for…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Graduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stuhlmann, Janice; Daniel, Cathy; Dellinger, Amy; Denny, R. Kenton; Powers, Taylor – Reading Psychology, 1999
Investigates whether training raters to interpret the scoring dimensions on a rubric would increase reliability. Compares two groups of kindergarten and first-grade teachers: one group with training, one without. Finds that training increases raters' abilities to reliably interpret scoring items. (SC)
Descriptors: Childrens Writing, Comparative Analysis, Generalizability Theory, Grade 1