Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Memory | 3 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Sign Language | 2 |
| Alphabets | 1 |
| American Sign Language | 1 |
| Communication Aids (for… | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Deafness | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Alamargot, Denis | 1 |
| Bersani, Henry A., Jr. | 1 |
| Grosjean, Francois | 1 |
| Luftig, Richard L. | 1 |
| Morin, Marie-France | 1 |
| Simard-Dupuis, Érika | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkAlamargot, Denis; Morin, Marie-France; Simard-Dupuis, Érika – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2018
We set out to (i) assess the handwriting skills of signing deaf students, and (ii) examine the extent to which their text composition and spelling performances are linked to their handwriting efficiency. We asked 15 prelingually and profoundly deaf middle-school students (M = 15.18 years), all sign-language users, and a group of hearing students…
Descriptors: Handwriting, Sign Language, Deafness, Hearing (Physiology)
Grosjean, Francois – Langages, 1979
Reviews research on sign language as an instrument of communication and on the psychological validity of sign language. Examines the production of sign language as compared to oral language, perception in sign language, and studies on the role of memory in sign language. (AM)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Grammar, Language Research, Memory
Peer reviewedLuftig, Richard L.; Bersani, Henry A., Jr. – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1988
The learning of a list of 20 Blissymbols and comparable American Sign Language signs by 121 nonhandicapped undergraduate psychology students was compared. Blissymbols were learned significantly faster than manual signs, particularly in early learning trials. Results are discussed in terms of the memory requirements of the two systems. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Communication Aids (for Disabled), Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level
