Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Design Preferences | 3 |
| Library Catalogs | 3 |
| Access to Information | 1 |
| Analysis of Variance | 1 |
| College Libraries | 1 |
| Computer Interfaces | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Computer Software Evaluation | 1 |
| Computer System Design | 1 |
| Display Systems | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Edwards, Kirstie | 1 |
| Fryser, Benjamin S. | 1 |
| Lundeen, Gerald | 1 |
| Spaepen, Arthur | 1 |
| Stirling, Keith H. | 1 |
| Tenopir, Carol | 1 |
| Van Mele, Isabel | 1 |
| Verheust, Mieke | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lundeen, Gerald; Tenopir, Carol – Microcomputers for Information Management: An International Journal for Library and Information Services, 1984
Discusses factors that should be considered when comparing microcomputer software for small and medium-sized library catalogs and describes eight specific packages--BRS/Search Micros/Mini Version, Card Catalog, Golden Retriever, INMAGIC, TEQLIB, FINDER, SCIMATE, and STAR. (Author/MBR)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Design Preferences, Display Systems
Peer reviewedFryser, Benjamin S.; Stirling, Keith H. – Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1984
Library patrons evaluated two versions of a bibliographic record displayed on cathode ray tube terminal, one representing Library of Congress (LC) format, the other, one of 15 format variations. Patrons generally preferred side heading label and underlining to LC forms, and upper and lower case letters to lower case only. (EJS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, College Libraries, Comparative Analysis, Design Preferences
Peer reviewedEdwards, Kirstie; Van Mele, Isabel; Verheust, Mieke; Spaepen, Arthur – Information Technology and Libraries, 1997
Three user interfaces to LIBIS, a library catalog accessible through the Internet, were evaluated for use by people who are motor impaired to identify how interface design influences the motor actions necessary to operate the system. Problems and recommendations related to simplicity, consistency, instinctiveness, interaction/feedback, and…
Descriptors: Access to Information, Comparative Analysis, Computer Interfaces, Computer Software Evaluation
