NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harrison, George M. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2015
The credibility of standard-setting cut scores depends in part on two sources of consistency evidence: intrajudge and interjudge consistency. Although intrajudge consistency feedback has often been provided to Angoff judges in practice, more evidence is needed to determine whether it achieves its intended effect. In this randomized experiment with…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roberts, William L.; Boulet, John; Sandella, Jeanne – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2017
When the safety of the public is at stake, it is particularly relevant for licensing and credentialing exam agencies to use defensible standard setting methods to categorize candidates into competence categories (e.g., pass/fail). The aim of this study was to gather evidence to support change to the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing-USA…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Comparative Analysis, Clinical Experience, Skill Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hsieh, Mingchuan – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2013
The Yes/No Angoff and Bookmark method for setting standards on educational assessment are currently two of the most popular standard-setting methods. However, there is no research into the comparability of these two methods in the context of language assessment. This study compared results from the Yes/No Angoff and Bookmark methods as applied to…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Comparative Analysis, Language Tests, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Behuniak, Peter, Jr.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
This study examined how local content specialists performed when applying the Angoff and Nedelsky standard setting procedures to objective-referenced instruments in reading and mathematics. Results revealed several differences between the standard setting procedures in terms of both level and consistency of the cut scores generated. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Interrater Reliability
Webb, Melvin W., II; Miller, Eva R. – 1995
As constructed-response items become an integral part of educational assessments, setting student performance standards on constructed-response items has become an important issue. Two standard-setting methods, one used for setting standards on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in reading in grade 8 and the other used to set…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Constructed Response, Criteria, Educational Assessment
Chang, Lei – 1996
It was hypothesized that, when compared to the Angoff method (W. H. Angoff, 1971), the Nedelsky method (L. Nedelsky, 1954) for standard setting had lower intrajudge inconsistency, lower cutscores, and lower cutscores especially for items presenting challenges to the judges. These hypotheses were tested and supported in a sample of 22 graduate…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cutting Scores, Difficulty Level, Distractors (Tests)
Garrido, Mariquita; Payne, David A. – 1987
Minimum competency cut-off scores on a statistics exam were estimated under four conditions: the Angoff judging method with item data (n=20), and without data available (n=19); and the Modified Angoff method with (n=19), and without (n=19) item data available to judges. The Angoff method required free response percentage estimates (0-100) percent,…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Linn, Robert L.; And Others – Applied Measurement in Education, 1992
Ten states participated in a cross-state scoring workshop in 1991, evaluating writing from elementary school, middle school, and high school students. Correlation of scores assigned by readers from one state with those from readers from another state were generally quite high. Implications for defining common standards are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Elementary School Students, Elementary Secondary Education