Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Deafness | 3 |
| Interference (Language) | 3 |
| English | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Language Processing | 2 |
| Sign Language | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| American Sign Language | 1 |
| Bilingual Students | 1 |
| Code Switching (Language) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Flaherty, Mary | 1 |
| Hoemann, Harry W. | 1 |
| Kreske, Catherine M. | 1 |
| Moran, Aidan | 1 |
| Thompson, Robin L. | 1 |
| Vigliocco, Gabriella | 1 |
| Vinson, David P. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkThompson, Robin L.; Vinson, David P.; Vigliocco, Gabriella – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
Signed languages exploit the visual/gestural modality to create iconic expression across a wide range of basic conceptual structures in which the phonetic resources of the language are built up into an analogue of a mental image (Taub, 2001). Previously, we demonstrated a processing advantage when iconic properties of signs were made salient in a…
Descriptors: Sign Language, Interference (Language), Language Processing, Decision Making
Flaherty, Mary; Moran, Aidan – American Annals of the Deaf, 2007
Most studies on the Stroop effect (unintentional automatic word processing) have been restricted to English speakers using vocal responses. Little is known about this effect with deaf signers. The study compared Stroop task responses among four different samples: deaf participants from a Japanese-language environment and from an English-language…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Language Processing, Deafness, Sign Language
Peer reviewedHoemann, Harry W.; Kreske, Catherine M. – Sign Language Studies, 1995
Describes a study that found, contrary to previous reports, that a strong, symmetrical release from proactive interference (PI) is the normal outcome for switches between American Sign Language (ASL) signs and English words and with switches between Manual and English alphabet characters. Subjects were college students enrolled in their first ASL…
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Bilingual Students, Code Switching (Language), Comparative Analysis
