NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Garcia-Perez, Miguel A.; Frary, Robert B. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
Simulation techniques were used to generate conventional test responses and track the proportion of alternatives examinees could classify independently before and after taking the test. Finite-state scores were compared with these actual values and with number-correct and formula scores. Finite-state scores proved useful. (TJH)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Guessing (Tests), Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Penfield, Douglas A.; Koffler, Stephen L. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1978
Three nonparametric alternatives to the parametric Bartlett test are presented for handling the K-sample equality of variance problem. The two-sample Siegel-Tukey test, Mood test, and Klotz test are extended to the multisample situation by Puri's methods. These K-sample scale tests are illustrated and compared. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Richard M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1985
Standard maximum likeliheed estimation was compared using two forms of robust estimation, BIWEIGHT (based on Tukey's Biweight) and AMTJACK (AMT-Robustified Jackknife), and Rasch model person analysis. The two procedures recovered the generating parameters, but Rasch person analysis also helped to identify the nature of a response disturbance. (GDC)
Descriptors: Ability, Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Estimation (Mathematics)
Nicewander, W. Alan; And Others – 1980
Two methods of interactive, computer-assisted testing methods for multiple-choice items were compared with each other and with conventional multiple-choice tests. The interactive testing methods compared were tailored testing and the respond-until-correct (RUC) item response method. In tailored testing, examinee ability is successively estimated…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Waller, Michael I. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
The fit of the 3-parameter model on data from tests of cognitive ability was compared to the fit of the Ability Removing Random Guessing model of M. I. Waller (1973). Three cohorts of about 1,000 children (fourth, seventh, and tenth graders) each were administered examinations in 11 content areas. (SLD)
Descriptors: Children, Cognitive Ability, Comparative Analysis, Elementary School Students
Muraki, Eiji – 1984
The TESTFACT computer program and full-information factor analysis of test items were used in a computer simulation conducted to correct for the guessing effect. Full-information factor analysis also corrects for omitted items. The present version of TESTFACT handles up to five factors and 150 items. A preliminary smoothing of the tetrachoric…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Computer Software, Correlation
Sherman, Susan W. – 1976
The multiple-choice science exercises used by the National Assessment of Educational Progress include an "I Don't Know" (IDK) alternative to estimate more accurately knowledge of groups of respondents. Group percentages of IDK responses were examined and compared with correct responses to see if the IDK introduces bias. Variance common…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Comparative Analysis, Groups, Guessing (Tests)