Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Group Dynamics | 2 |
| Judges | 2 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Computer Mediated… | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Critical Path Method | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Feasibility Studies | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Applied Testing… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKatz, Irvin R.; Tannenbaum, Richard J. – Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 2014
Web-based standard setting holds promise for reducing the travel and logistical inconveniences of traditional, face-to-face standard setting meetings. However, because there are few published reports of setting standards via remote meeting technology, little is known about the practical potential of the approach, including technical feasibility of…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Comparative Analysis, Feasibility Studies, Program Implementation
Download full textCizek, Gregory J.; Fitzgerald, Shawn M. – 1996
A group-process approach to standard setting was compared to an independent approach for a medical specialty certification examination. Both approaches used the Angoff (1971) standard-setting method. In the group-process method, reviewers discussed items and their ratings during the rating process; in the independent condition, reviewers provided…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Group Dynamics, Judges
