Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Dependents | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Family Characteristics | 1 |
| Federal Aid | 1 |
| Financial Aid Applicants | 1 |
| Grants | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Income | 1 |
| Mathematical Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Pell Grant Program | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textAdvanced Technology, Inc., Reston, VA. – 1984
The development of the error prone model (EPM) for the 1984-1985 student financial aid validation criteria for Pell Grant recipient selection is discussed, based on a comparison of the 1983-1984 EPM criteria and a newly estimated EPM. Procedures/assumptions on which the new EPM was based include: a sample of 1982-1983 Pell Grant recipients…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Dependents, Error Patterns, Evaluation Criteria
