NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clarkeburn, Henriikka; Kettula, Kirsi – Teaching in Higher Education, 2012
This study looks at the fairness of assessing learning journals both as the fairness in creating a valid and robust marking process as well as how different student groups may have unfair disadvantages in performing well in reflective assessment tasks. The fairness of a marking process is discussed through reflecting on the practical process and…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Reflection, Summative Evaluation, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baker, Beverly A. – Assessing Writing, 2010
In high-stakes writing assessments, rater training in the use of a rating scale does not eliminate variability in grade attribution. This realisation has been accompanied by research that explores possible sources of rater variability, such as rater background or rating scale type. However, there has been little consideration thus far of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Hackbert, Peter H. – Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 2004
Entrepreneurship courses commonly use various kinds of group work, cooperative learning, study circles and study teams. A major challenge of this pedagogy is the unbiased grading of group members based on the accountability of individual performances. This paper provides an approach to using student peer assessment to provide feedback on…
Descriptors: Teamwork, Team Training, Cooperative Learning, Entrepreneurship