NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Pannell, Lynette Martin – ProQuest LLC, 2013
The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) scores between fourth-grade African American male students who were enrolled in single-sex classrooms and their counterparts who were enrolled in coeducational classrooms. The research provided descriptive data concerning one Title I school in rural…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Males, African Americans, Case Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hess, Amie – Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 2010
There are many assumptions made about the beliefs behind abstinence-only until marriage (AOUM) sex education, yet comparatively little research examining the views of abstinence education providers. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 21 abstinence grantees throughout New York State, I examine how individuals working in abstinence organizations…
Descriptors: Sex Education, Sexuality, Interviews, Federal Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grotberg, Edith H.; Hurt, Maure, Jr. – Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1975
Addressing the problems of cross-research analysis, two Federal Interagency Panels have recommended that researchers: 1) use more complete definitions of the variables used in their study; 2) be more precise in their descriptions of populations; and 3) insure that their methodology and research lends itself to a comparability review. (BJG)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Children, Comparative Analysis, Definitions
Herriott, Robert E.; Firestone, William A. – 1982
A comparison of multisite educational research projects involving qualitative research methods is reported. In phase 1 of the project, telephone interviews with key staff members of 25 projects determined ways in which each project handled important qualitative design and implementation choices. Phase 2 consisted of a more intensive study of 5…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis, Educational Policy, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kostoff, Ronald N. – Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994
Describes the practice of federal evaluation of research impact through three approaches: retrospective methods; qualitative methods, including peer review; and quantitative methods. Recommended areas for study in federal research impact assessment are suggested, including predictive reliability, comparative studies, time and cost estimates,…
Descriptors: Bibliometrics, Comparative Analysis, Costs, Evaluation Methods