Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Cutting Scores | 2 |
| Error of Measurement | 2 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 2 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 2 |
| Concurrent Validity | 1 |
| Content Validity | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Hsieh, Mingchuan | 1 |
| Woehr, David J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Taiwan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkHsieh, Mingchuan – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2013
The Yes/No Angoff and Bookmark method for setting standards on educational assessment are currently two of the most popular standard-setting methods. However, there is no research into the comparability of these two methods in the context of language assessment. This study compared results from the Yes/No Angoff and Bookmark methods as applied to…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Comparative Analysis, Language Tests, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewedWoehr, David J.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1991
Methods for setting cutoff scores based on criterion performance, normative comparison, and absolute judgment were compared for scores on a multiple-choice psychology examination for 121 undergraduates and 251 undergraduates as a comparison group. All methods fell within the standard error of measurement. Implications of differences for decision…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Concurrent Validity, Content Validity, Cutting Scores
