Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 5 |
| Criterion Referenced Tests | 5 |
| Test Format | 5 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Cutting Scores | 2 |
| Mastery Tests | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Comprehension | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Conoyer, Sarah J. | 1 |
| Eignor, Daniel R. | 1 |
| Ford, Jeremy W. | 1 |
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 1 |
| Hosp, John L. | 1 |
| Klein, Thomas W. | 1 |
| Lembke, Erica S. | 1 |
| Mills, Craig N. | 1 |
| Nehm, Ross H. | 1 |
| Schonfeld, Irvin Sam | 1 |
| Smith, R. Alex | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ford, Jeremy W.; Conoyer, Sarah J.; Lembke, Erica S.; Smith, R. Alex; Hosp, John L. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2018
In the present study, two types of curriculum-based measurement (CBM) tools in science, Vocabulary Matching (VM) and Statement Verification for Science (SV-S), a modified Sentence Verification Technique, were compared. Specifically, this study aimed to determine whether the format of information presented (i.e., SV-S vs. VM) produces differences…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques, Comparative Analysis
Nehm, Ross H.; Schonfeld, Irvin Sam – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2008
Growing recognition of the central importance of fostering an in-depth understanding of natural selection has, surprisingly, failed to stimulate work on the development and rigorous evaluation of instruments that measure knowledge of it. We used three different methodological tools, the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection (CINS), a modified…
Descriptors: Evolution, Science Education, Interviews, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewedMills, Craig N. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1983
This study compares the results obtained using the Angoff, borderline group, and contrasting groups methods of determining performance standards. Congruent results were obtained from the Angoff and contrasting groups methods for several test forms. Borderline group standards were not similar to standards obtained with other methods. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Eignor, Daniel R.; Hambleton, Ronald K. – 1979
The purpose of the investigation was to obtain some relationships among (1) test lengths, (2) shape of domain-score distributions, (3) advancement scores, and (4) several criterion-referenced test score reliability and validity indices. The study was conducted using computer simulation methods. The values of variables under study were set to be…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores
Klein, Thomas W. – 1990
Characteristics that distinguish criterion-referenced tests from their norm-referenced counterparts are discussed, including: the purposes that they are designed to serve; the characteristics of the types of items that they contain; and the manner in which they are developed. More specifically, the distinguishing characteristics include: reference…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Differences, Educational Assessment

Direct link
