Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Criterion Referenced Tests | 2 |
| Group Testing | 2 |
| Individual Testing | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Cohort Analysis | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Introductory Courses | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Calkins, Robin | 1 |
| Leight, Hayley | 1 |
| Neidermeyer, Fred C. | 1 |
| Saunders, Cheston | 1 |
| Sullivan, Howard J. | 1 |
| Withers, Michelle | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkLeight, Hayley; Saunders, Cheston; Calkins, Robin; Withers, Michelle – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2012
Collaborative testing has been shown to improve performance but not always content retention. In this study, we investigated whether collaborative testing could improve both performance and content retention in a large, introductory biology course. Students were semirandomly divided into two groups based on their performances on exam 1. Each group…
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Biology, Scoring, Group Testing
Peer reviewedNeidermeyer, Fred C.; Sullivan, Howard J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1972
Results of the study indicate that the 3-choice, selected-response tests often utilized in programs of this type do not provide an accurate indication of end-of-year achievement for many children, and their continued use is not recommended. (Authors)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Grade 1, Group Testing
